The Truth About Fox Interfering With My Visitations With Our Son

For years I have been claiming that when Fox had custody of our son, Gabriel, he interfered with every one of my visitations with Gabriel RCMP Interviews dated 2016-06-17; 2016-07-13; TR 2016-06-15 p3l4-43; p30l43-p31l15; emails dated 2013-12-02 11:56 AM; 2015-05-07 4:26 PM; 2015-05-07 4:34 PM.

But in reality, Fox never once attempted to interfere with any of those visitations. In fact, in each instance he usually went out of his way to be accommodating, and it was I who caused the visitation to be cancelled, or changed, at the last minute.

In this article, we review each of those visitations and I provide the proof, showing that I, not Fox, was the one interfering with them.

In 2000, Fox and I had a child, Gabriel, together. In 2001, while we were living in Los Angeles (which is where Fox was from), we separated and I moved back to Florida to get back together with my ex-boyfriend (Michael Capuano) who was still married and had a child with another woman.

Fox filed for divorce, and custody of Gabriel. Ultimately, Fox got custody of Gabriel and I moved on, marrying my ex-boyfriend and having another child (Sage) with him. Over the next nine years I had no contact with Fox or Gabriel other than a few, sporadic phone calls in 2006-2007.

In January 2011, Fox hired a private investigator and tracked me down. I was living in Phoenix, AZ, then. He contacted me, asking if I'd like to hear about Gabriel. Over the next few months, he put me in touch with Gabriel and I made a couple trips to Los Angeles to meet and visit Gabriel.

In June 2011, I began scheming to take Gabriel on a trip to San Diego, where I was going to abscond with him and bring him back to Arizona. When Fox found out, he said he could not approve of the trip. So, in August 2011, while Fox was away, I went to Los Angeles, abducted Gabriel, and brought him back to Arizona with me.

I then filed for emergency custody in the Arizona family court, falsely claiming Fox had been hiding Gabriel from me for the past nine years. After three months, the California and Arizona family courts determined that California was Gabriel's home state, and ordered me to return Gabriel to Fox's custody.

But even after I abducted Gabriel and took him to another state, Fox still agreed to visitation between me and Gabriel – because that's what Gabriel said he wanted.

Okay, you're all caught up.

In the Spring of 2011, after Fox had tracked down and contacted me, Fox was the one that encouraged both me and Gabriel to meet each other and to possibly build a relationship. After I and Gabriel spoke on the phone a few times, I said I wanted to come to Los Angeles to visit him in person. Fox did nothing to interfere with or to impede that. In fact, Fox encouraged it. I went to Los Angeles twice that Spring, each time for the weekend. But then, I started scheming behind Fox's back, and a week before it was scheduled to occur he found out I had been planning to show up without notice, and take Gabriel to San Diego "for a week". Obviously, Fox was suspicious about why I had withheld that plan from him. Fox suspected my true intention was to take Gabriel, and flee to another state with him. So Fox called me and told me, under these circumstances (i.e. that I deliberately withheld this supposed San Diego trip from him), he could not agree to let Gabriel go away with me for a week. I mean, I've only been in Gabriel's life for a couple of months, and during that time only two weekend-long visits, and Fox had a long history with me and knew I'm a lying, manipulating, narcissist.

I believe all of my actions since that time, which could reasonably be expected to adversely affect Fox, have been retaliation because he refused to let Gabriel go out of town with me for a week after only two brief visits. I believe any interest I have shown in having custody of Gabriel has been completely insincere - I do not want to be a parent to him, I just want to prevent Fox from being a parent to him. Don't think for one second that that seems excessively vindictive. I really am that evil and vindictive. I even admitted it in an email once email dated 2012-02-08 8:08 AM.

In late November 2011, I said that I would "look into" getting Gabriel a flight from Los Angeles to Phoenix then back to Los Angeles, for his winter break. I said she did not want to make the drive again email dated 2011-11-28 1:34 PM.

On 2011-12-06, the California family court ordered that for the upcoming winter break, Gabriel would visit with me from 2011-12-30 through 2012-01-07, and that any changes to the court ordered visitation schedule shall be as the parents mutually agree at least two weeks in advance Findings and Order After Hearing, section II(B)(1), page 4.

Gabriel had expressed that he did not want to spend any of his winter break with me, considering he had just recently gotten back from being abducted by me for three months. Nevertheless, in order to be "reasonable" and "accommodating", Fox agreed to Gabriel spending a week of his winter break with me in Arizona.

Following the December 2011 family court hearing, I said I was going to drive to Los Angeles and pick Gabriel up on 2011-12-31 and that I would get him a plane ticket to fly back on 2012-01-07. Fox was fine with that because the court order stated 2011-12-30 through 2012-01-07, and the dates in question were more than two weeks away. That change was initiated by me and agreed to by Fox. With that change, the visitation period would be seven days.

I later asked Fox if it would be okay for Gabriel to fly back on 2012-01-08, because the flight was $50 cheaper. Gabriel had stated he would rather return on 2012-01-07, and Fox was reluctant to have him return the day before he was to return to school after being off for three weeks, but again, to try to be reasonable and to accomodate me, Fox agreed. So on 2011-12-18, I purchased Gabriel a return flight, for 2012-01-08 email dated 2011-12-18 8:07 PM.

After that, I then asked Fox if I could pick Gabriel up on 2011-12-30 rather than on 2011-12-31. I claimed it was because the 31^st would be New Years eve and I would end up spending 13 hours on the road driving from Phoenix to Los Angeles then back to Phoenix. I claimed I had significant plans for New Years eve and hoped I would not have to break them. Again, Fox agreed, in order to be reasonable and accommodating, even though it violated the two week notice requirement.

On 2011-12-27, Fox emailed me asking if I'll have some time to discuss some matters when I pick Gabriel up on 2011-12-30 email dated 2011-12-27 8:22 PM. On 2011-12-29 at 11:42 AM, the day before I was scheduled to pick Gabriel up at their home in Los Angeles, I confirmed I would be coming to Los Angeles and picking him up on 2011-12-30 between 2 and 4 PM email dated 2011-12-29 11:42 AM.

But on 2011-12-30, Fox received an email from Southwest Airlines at 2:52 AM email dated 2011-12-30 2:52 AM. At some point between 11:42 AM on the 29^th and 2:52 AM on the 30^th, I changed my mind about driving to Los Angeles and went ahead and got Gabriel a plane ticket, without letting Fox know.

I made that last minute change without consulting Fox. I did so without any concern or consideration for his schedule and prior obligations. The change would mean, rather than just having to make sure he was home between 2 PM and 4 PM, Fox would now have to postpone whatever else he had planned, to transport Gabriel to LAX, to catch a 6:55 PM flight. Something he was NOT required to do under the custody/visitation order. All transportation and related logistics are the responsibility of the visiting parent, not the custodial parent. Not to mention, I hadn't provided the required two weeks notice.

Did I think Fox would enjoy spending three hours in rush hour traffic, and an hour sitting around the airport? And having to do that given only a few hours notice? Do you think it would ever occur to me that Fox might have had other plans or commitments during that time? No, man! No chance of that. The only thing that matters to me is me. The only thing that I ever take into account is how it will affect me.

So, when Fox got up the morning of 2011-12-30 and saw the email from Southwest, he logged onto their site and changed the flight to 2012-01-01, which, given the modified return date (of 2012-01-08 rather than 2012-01-17) would still afford me seven days for the visit email dated 2011-12-30 8:38 AM.

Fox then sent me an email, informing me he had changed the flight to 2012-01-01, which given the 2012-01-08 return date, would give me the seven days we had previously agreed to. Fox pointed out to me that I had previously claimed the flights on 2012-01-08 where $50 cheaper than the flights on 2012-01-07, and I had cited that as my reason for requesting the change in the return flight. However, the fact that I was now willing to pay almost $200 for a last minute flight suggests that the $50 was not really that much of a factor after all. Fox also pointed out that since I was now willing to fly Gabriel to Phoenix, rather than driving to Los Angeles and back to Phoenix, there would no longer be a scheduling conflict with my New Years eve plans email dated 2011-12-30 9:22 AM.

When I purchased the flight, I did not select the option for Gabriel to fly as an unaccompanied minor. Southwest charges a $50 fee for that, and I was trying to evade paying it. Southwest's policy requires children under the age of 12 who are flying alone, to fly as an "unaccompanied minor", but children 12 and up are not required to. However, children 12 and over are required to show ID, and Gabriel's ID proves he was actually 11 at the time, not 12 email dated 2011-12-30 10:35 AM. So, my bright idea was to lie to the airline, saying Gabriel was 12 so I wouldn't have to pay the unaccompanied minor fee, except that if he's 12 then he has to provide ID, which will prove he's actually 11.

I responded to Fox, claiming I tried calling him to talk about it. However, there were no calls from me between 11:42 AM on 2011-12-29 and 2:52 AM on 2011-12-30. I claimed I did not expect to have the money to get Gabriel a plane ticket from Los Angeles to Phoenix which, if purchased in advance would have been about $95, but I had $192 to get him a ticket at the last minute. I claimed I could not change the return flight now, however later in the day I actually did change it. I apologized and insisted moving forward the travel arrangements would be better planned. I said this would not turn into a pattern email dated 2011-12-30 11:44 AM.

In that email, I also said I would pay the additional $50 unaccompanied minor fee, but that it had to be paid at the gate. I essentially said that if Fox pays it I would reimburse him. But knowing me as Fox does, he knew that reimbursement would never occur.

A few minutes after that email, I sent another one. In this one I claimed I didn't care that Fox changed the return flight email dated 2011-12-30 11:55 AM. Which is peculiar since Fox hadn't changed the return flight. I then said 2012-01-01 is on Saturday which would mean Gabriel would only be here for two days. Fox responded that 2012-01-01 is actually Sunday, not Saturday; and the return flight is 2012-01-08, which is seven days later, not two days email dated 2011-12-30 12:44 PM.

Fox sent me an email, responding to my claim that future visits will be better organized and that this will not become a pattern. Fox pointed out to me that this type of chaos and last minute changes is actually the norm for me, and Fox didn't believe anything is going to change in that respect. Fox told me he don't believe I would ever consider, for even a moment, how my chaos and last minute changes adversely affect the other people involved. And he told me he will not cover the $50 unaccompanied minor fee because he knows from his prior dealings with me that I will promise whatever I need to to get what I want, but with no intention of keeping that promise email dated 2011-12-30 12:42 PM. I emailed Fox, asking him to call me so we can discuss it email dated 2011-12-30 12:59 PM.

Ultimately, I cancelled the flight from Los Angeles to Phoenix at the last minute, and drove to Los Angeles to pick Gabriel up on 2011-12-31. I said I'd arrive at their home between 2 PM and 4 PM, but I ended up arriving about four hours late.

In addition to all these emails, at one point we had spoken on the phone and I claimed the reason I decided to get Gabriel a plane ticket was because I had some family visiting from out of town, for New Years, and I really wanted them to meet Gabriel. I said that if I had driven to pick him up I would not be able to make it back in time for that. Which, of course, didn't make any sense because if I drove to pick him up on 2011-12-30, then I would have been back in Phoenix with plenty of time. Fox later found out that the family that was visiting was actually my boyfriend's family - not mine; and that Gabriel ended up spending most of New Years eve alone in his room. Gabriel never actually met any of that family that I was so insistent on him being there to meet. So why all the fuss? Who knows. Something to do, I guess.

So, in this instance, it was clearly me who kept changing the visitation plans, and doing so without checking with Fox or providing him the court ordered two weeks notice.

On 2012-01-30, Fox discovered on the internet, that I had been arrested a few months prior for drug possession. He emailed me, requesting we discuss the matter as he was concerned how it might affect Gabriel during his visitation with me email dated 2012-01-30 9:10 AM. Coincidentally, the arrest occurred on Gabriel's birthday, while he was in my care in Arizona (during the period while I had abducted him).

I called Fox shortly thereafter, and was belligerent and hostile. I insisted the search and the arrest were illegal and the charges were going to be dropped (Fox later determined that was all false: the search was legal because my fiance gave the police permission to search the apartment; there was nothing illegal about the arrest; and the charges were not dropped). I further, falsely, claimed I had a medical marijuana card at the time (that was false because I hadn't even applied for the card until after the arrest, and it wasn't issued until 2011-11-07). I was extremely defensive and hostile and told him this is none of his business. He told me he don't care what I do, his concern is for Gabriel when he's in my care. I hung up on me.

Later that day I emailed Fox a photo of my medical marijuana card email dated 2012-01-31 1:54 PM. In subsequent emails I continued to insist it's none of Fox's business and that he's not my "prosecuting attorney". I told him to "limit yourself to items concerning Gabriel and his current needs" email dated 2012-01-31 10:12 PM. Fox told me this does concern Gabriel and his current needs because if, while he's with me, I'm either high or suffering from a chronic and debilitating condition then that would affect my ability to take care of him during those visits email dated 2012-02-02 1:33 PM. I did not respond further.

Over the past month Fox had also discovered on the internet, that my current fiance, Kristopher Lauchner, with whom I was living, had an extensive, violent criminal record including attempted murder, numerous aggravated assaults, and possession of methamphetamine. When Fox asked me about this I, again, became belligerent and hostile and told him that's none of his business.

On 2012-02-06, leading up to Presidents Day weekend (February 18-20), Fox had not heard anything from me about any intentions to pick up Gabriel for my scheduled visitation. So, on 2012-02-06, Fox sent me an email asking whether I intended to exercise my visitation right that weekend email dated 2012-02-06 7:08 AM. He received no response from me.

On 2012-02-07, Fox emailed me to provide formal notice of his intention to hold an ex parte hearing regarding his recent dicoveries of mine and Lauchner's drug use and criminal activities. Fox would be seeking a temporary order that Gabriel's visits be supervised, that I be required to submit to a drug test prior to those visits, and that Gabriel not be left in Lauchner's care email dated 2012-02-07 8:16 PM. The purpose of this notice was to give me a fair and reasonable opportunity to appear at the hearing to explain the drug use and criminal activity.

Fox forwarded me a copy of the documents he would be filing with the court, so I would be fully aware of his claims and have sufficient opportunity to respond to them email dated 2012-02-08 12:57 AM. Clearly, he was not trying to be sneaky or underhanded. He was open and up front with me at every turn. He provided me sufficient notice and copies of the documents and information he would be presenting.

I then responded, not surprisingly, with belligerence and hostility, accusing him of harassment email dated 2012-02-08 8:08 AM.

Fox then responded to my hostile allegations, pointing out that if I consider his responses "harassment" then I can simply stop making false allegations against him, but as long as I'm going to make such allegations against him then he has the right to defend himself by responding to those allegations email dated 2012-02-08 8:52 AM.

Fox then further responded that the claims he was raising in the ex parte application are based on his perception of the evidence and that if I disagree with that perception I'm welcome to present my side, but getting mad and defensive and hostile, and resorting to personal insults against him is not a legitimate debate tactic email dated 2012-02-08 9:26 AM. At that point I shut up and went away.

Fox then sent me an email, letting me know he would be presenting evidence of my arrest and involuntary, court ordered, psychiatric confinement from 2000, in Santa Monica and that I had given the police and the court, at that time, the fake name Virginia Tomlin email dated 2012-02-08 10:22 AM. And again, Fox did this so I could be prepared to address those issues at the hearing and wouldn't be caught off guard by them. I responded with hostility and belligerence email dated 2012-02-08 12:36 PM.

Fox responded that the purpose of bringing up a drug related conviction from 12 years prior was to show that these drug problems are not a new or recent development, but rather a life long pattern; Fox told me that his informing me of his intentions was a bad startegic move on his part but that he was not trying to take advantage of my lack of knowledge or experience in the law, He was trying to be fair to me. He told me he was not trying to screw me over or get back at me for something - he was only interested in making sure Gabriel is safe while he's in my care email dated 2012-02-08 1:16 PM. This email thread clearly shows what was typical in Fox's dealings with me from 2011 to 2013. Fox would consistently try to be accommodating, objective and fair; and I would respond with hostility, insults and threats.

By the end of 2012-02-08 Fox still hadn't received a response from me about whether I intended to visit with Gabriel during the Presidents Day weekend, so he followed up with me. Fox told me if I'm not planning on visiting that weekend, then we can hold off on the ex parte hearing until 2012-02-21, since we already had another family court hearing scheduled on that day anyway, but if I did plan to bring Gabriel to Phoenix before that then we'd have to have the hearing prior to the Presidents Day weekend email dated 2012-02-08 11:44 PM. On 2012-02-09 I responded saying we'd have the ex parte hearing tomorrow and I'll make a decision depending on the outcome of the hearing email dated 2012-02-09 10:55 AM.

I did not appear for the ex parte hearing regarding my drug use and criminal activities. Based on the evidence Fox had submitted, and my failure to appear or to call in, the judge ordered that the Presidents Day visit be suspended and a hearing be scheduled to address the matter Temporary Order, 2012-02-14.

Moreover, in the weeks leading up to that weekend, Fox repeatedly emailed me asking me whether I intended to visit Gabriel at that time. I refused to respond, I gave no indication that I even intended to visit him. I had no intention of visiting with Gabriel during the Presidents Day weekend. Fox's filing the ex parte petition just gave me something to fight about and something to falsely accuse Fox of.

So, according to me, Fox interfered with my visitation with Gabriel for the Presidents Day weekend by filing an ex parte application in the court just before that weekend. However, the emails clearly show Fox made extensive efforts to inform and include me in the process for two weeks leading up to the hearing. And, the application was based solely on the discovery of drug use and extensive criminal activity going on in my home.

Contrary to what I insist, this application had absolutely nothing to do with Fox being jealous of my boyfriend, or wanting to get back at me for something. When Fox found out about the drugs and criminal activity he contacted me and gave me an opportunity to explain, but rather than discuss it civilly, I chose to be defensive and hostile and to tell him it's none of his business. Then, I chose not to appear for the hearing! What else could Fox reasonably have done in those circumstances?

Leading up to the Spring Break Fox had heard nothing from me about whether I intended to bring Gabriel to Phoenix for that visitation period. Technically, I'm not legally required to inform him of my intention to exercise my right to visitation - I'm only required to cooperate with Fox on making travel arrangements at least two weeks in advance of the date of travel and only if those arrangements will affect Fox in some way. In other words, if I will be going to Los Angeles and picking Gabriel up from their home then I'm not required to coordinate anything with Fox (other than for Fox to ensure Gabriel will be home at that time). So, the fact that I did not inform Fox of my intention to visit for the Spring Break doesn't necessarily mean I didin't intend to visit. And I being Desiree, you can never assume I would have enough courtesy to actually provide anybody notice of my intentions.

Nevertheless, on 2012-03-16, Fox received a confirmation email from Southwest Airlines, that a ticket had been purschased for Gabriel for 2012-03-23, from Los Angeles to Phoenix email dated 2012-03-16 5:58 PM. That was odd because the spring break didn't start until 2012-03-30. Obviously, I made a mistake and booked the flight a week early. Fox had considered emailing me to let me know, but then he thought "you know what, she's been nothing but a lying, cheating, miserable cunt toward me since August 2011 so why the fuck should I show her anymore courtesy". Fox chose to ignore the email and let me discover the mistake on my own. Particularly since the visitation order required the travel arrangements to be agreed upon by both parents at least two weeks in advance, and March 16 is only one week before March 23 - not two weeks. Also, I did not check with Fox to see if he'd even be available to bring Gabriel to the airport at that time. Typical Desiree!

On 2012-03-22 I realized the mistake and changed the flight to 2012-03-30. I then emailed Fox, acknowledging it was a mistake on my part email dated 2012-03-23 12:29 PM. But you'll notice, again I proceeded with making/changing the travel arrangements less than two weeks before the travel date and, again, I never bothered to check with Fox about whether he'd be available at that time. The court order means absolutely nothing to me, unless Fox is the one violating it. Again, typical Desiree - everyone else has to follow the rules, but those rules should not have to apply to me. Fuck, I'm a horrible person!

Otherwise, there were no other interesting occurrences relating to this visit. Fox took Gabriel to the airport on 2012-03-30 and Gabriel caught is flight without complications. Contrary to my insistence that Fox has interfered with every one of my scheduled visitations the only complication that arose in this instance is that I could not be bothered to verify when the Spring Break started and I bought the ticket for the wrong day. But obviously, that was my mistake, not Fox's.

But believe it or not, I actually had the nerve to later blame Fox for her purchasing the flight for the wrong date email dated 2012-06-14 1:33 PM.

Memorial Day weekend in 2012 was from May 25-28. In early May, I informed Fox I had already bought Gabriel's plane ticket for the Memorial Day weekend. But leading up to the weekend, Fox heard nothing further from me about any intentions of visiting Gabriel for that period.

There were, however, a number of unrelated, angry emails from me and my boyfriend, following Mother's Day (2012-05-17) because Gabriel did not call me to wish me a happy Mother's Day (again, the incredible narcissism of this woman) email dated 2012-05-17 10:06 AM.

On 2012-05-27, Fox emailed me to ask if there's any reason I didn't exercise my visitation email dated 2011-05-27 12:23 PM. I responded that it was purely an issue of finances email dated 2011-05-27 1:24 PM. Hmm! Interesting, considering I had previously claimed I already bought Gabriel's ticket. Oh well, just me being my usual pathological liar self, I guess.

So Fox clearly did nothing to interfere with the Memorial Day weekend visitation. The visitation didn't occur solely because I couldn't be bothered to execute it or to even let them know I wouldn't be executing it.

Under the court imposed visitation order I was authorized to take custody of Gabriel the day after his summer break began, and I was required to return him a week before the summer break ended. And, as pointed out above, I was required to make the travel arrangements with Fox at least two weeks prior to the date of travel Findings and Order After Hearing, section II(B)(1), page 4.

However, I went ahead and made the travel arrangements without checking with Fox at all, then notified him of them at 10pm on 2012-06-12 – nine days before the flight email dated 2012-06-12 10:09 PM. The confirmation email from Southwest Airlines, which I forwarded him, had all information removed except for the confirmation number. Fox had to log onto Southwest's site to obtain the departure date and time.

Another interesting thing about that email from me is that I purchased the ticket on 2012-06-08 (exactly 14 days before departure) but I didn't inform Fox of it until 2012-06-12 (10 days before departure). If I had forwarded him the confirmation email right away it would have met the two week requirement. Why did I sit on it for four days? Who knows.

The flight I booked was at 1:20 PM on a Friday! Yes, the middle of a work day. I didn't care that Fox had just been hired at a new job, which he would be starting on 2012-06-19, and could not take the whole day off three days after starting (the new job was in Burbank; he was living in Carson; obviously, he would not have time to go to the office before having to bring Gabriel to LAX, and by the time the flight departed, it would be too late for him to bother going to the office).

Fox informed me he would not be able to rearrange his schedule on such short notice, to accommodate that flight in the middle of a work day. Fox requested I reschdule it either for the evening or the weekend. He was polite and respectful emails dated 2012-06-12 10:51 PM; 2012-06-13 4:41 PM. I responded after two days (seven days before the flight), with belligerence and hostility, insisting that the court order required Fox to bring Gabriel to the airport and claiming I was going out of my way to accommodate him email dated 2012-06-14 1:33 PM.

I also falsely claimed I had had to modify the travel arrangements on every one of the prior visits, because of Fox. I referenced a number of the visitation periods which are discussed above, but because of my demented perception of reality, I actually blamed Fox for each of those visits being disrupted email dated 2012-06-14 1:33 PM.

Fox responded, addressing each of her points, in turn, and pointing out how I was wrong about absolultely everything in my email email dated 2012-06-13 4:47 PM. This email, in particular, provides real insight into how incredibly self-centered and narcissistic I am. I highly recommend giving it a read.

Having proven to me that I was completely wrong on every point and that my narcissitic belief that the universe revolves around me and that everything exists relative to me, is just false, I responded saying it is Fox's contention that I bow down and kiss his ass 2012-06-14 6:53 PM. Again, my twisted view of reality: I ignored the court order and scheduled Gabriel's flight without providing Fox two weeks notice and without checking whether Fox would be available to take Gabriel to the airport at that time, then when Fox tells me that he's not available at that time I get angry and accuse him of not complying with the court order. So, Fox responded asking me how I figure he expects me to bow down and kiss his ass. Fox points out I am the one that scheduled the flight without two weeks notice, without checking whether it conflicted with his prior commitments. Fox told me he's done playing these games, he's not doing anything more to accommodate me. He will release Gabriel to my care as He's required to do but he's not taking Gabriel to the airport and he's not going out of his way for me anymore emails dated 2012-06-14 8:40 PM; 2012-06-14 11:19 PM.

So then I said I'm going to call the court and tell them Fox is refusing to cooperate email dated 2012-06-15 1:00 AM. The next morning I called the court, claiming that Fox was refusing to allow Gabriel to visit me. The court called Fox, and censured him. He explained that I had booked the flight less than two weeks before the travel date; I did not provide him any notice; and I did not check with him about whether he was available at that time. He told the court he was starting a new job that week and could not take an entire day off to bring Gabriel to the airport in the middle of the day. He told them he wasn't refusing to release Gabriel to my custody, he was only refusing to transport Gabriel to the airport in the middle of a workday. Apparently, I had failed to mention any of that to them. They agreed I was completely in the wrong, called me back, and told me to reschedule the flight.

Suddenly, my attitude completely changed and now I was back to being sweet, caring Desiree who just wants to do what's best for Gabriel email dated 2012-06-15 4:32 PM - this is more typical Desiree: belligerent and confrontational when I don't get my way, or when I'm wrong about something; but when the court tells me I'm wrong, suddenly I forget all of my belligerence and arguments and provocation, and put on the act of sweet, caring, accommodating Desiree, talking about only wanting to cooperate to do what's best for Gabriel. Fucking psycho, man! Fucking lying, manipulating, psycho I am!

After the court told me I'm wrong, and that I need to reschedule the flight for a time that's agreeable to both of us, I suddenly go ahead and ask Fox if a Saturday evening flight is okay email dated 2012-06-15 4:32 PM. Fox tells me yes email dated 2012-06-15 5:51 PM. Suddenly, now, changing the flight was not an issue for me. So all that fighting and arguing was completely for nothing. I just didn't want to "give in" to Fox. You see what I mean? I'm just a fucking, fucked up, psycho bitch who just argues and fights and tries to spread my misery for absolutely no reason. And then I accuse Fox of being the one doing all that!

And so, once again, it was me who caused this chaos, or "interference", not Fox.

Leading up to Columbus Day weekend, Fox heard nothing from me regarding my intention to exercise my visitation rights that weekend.

A few days prior to that, the fiance I was living with, had been arrested for shoplifting an AR-15 (even though he's prohibited from possessing firearms due to his criminal record), the police executed a search warrant on our home (and found the stolen rifle and some meth), and the story of it was on the news CBS/KPHO news segment, 2012-10-, so perhaps I had higher priorities to deal with.

On 2012-10-06, Fox emailed me reminding me that I had been scheduled for a visitation that weekend, and asking why I chose not to execute it email dated 2012-10-06 8:02 PM.

I responded "Finances", by which Fox assumed I meant I couldn't afford it. But in the same email, I also expressed that I didn't even know I was scheduled for a visit email dated 2012-10-06 9:07 PM. That being the case, then my reason for not having the visit wasn't because of insufficient finances, it was because I didn't even realize I was scheduled for a visit. And that shows you how much I really cared about visiting with Gabriel.

Anyway, I opted not to exercise that visit. Fox had nothing to do with it.

Leading up to Thanksgiving 2012, Fox heard nothing from me about any intentions to exercise my visitation rights for that period.

There was, otherwise, a lot of correspondence between me and Fox around that time because Fox had received a number of employment offers from companies in Vancouver, Canada, and was seeking the family court's authorization to relocate to Vancouver with Gabriel. Of course, I was opposing that for no legitimate reason, even though it wouldn't affect me or my visitation in any way.

However, there was no mention of visiting Gabriel during Thanksgiving.

Thanksgiving came and went without a word about visitation from me.

On 2012-11-21 Fox sent me an email asking if I intended to exercise my visitation for Gabriel's winter break email dated 2012-11-21 9:57 AM.

I responded, stating that I did intend to visit with Gabriel over the winter break. I then went on to claim Gabriel had not been exposed to any marijuana use during his visits, and that I did not "allow" Lauchner to keep "anything" in the house. I claimed Lauchner had hidden the firearms and drugs and that I had no knowledge of them email dated 2012-11-21 2:08 PM. Interestingly, I didn't deny Gabriel had been exposed to meth use, just marijuana.

Fox informed me that, given the recent developments, namely Lauchner's arrest for shoplifting the AR-15, the search warrant being executed on my home, the stolen rifle and crystal meth being found in the home, he would be requesting an ex parte hearing to request my visitation be changed to supervised until a full hearing can be held in March 2013 (four months from that time) email dated 2012-11-21 2:51 PM.

I falsely claimed in the news media, to the police, and in my testimony at Fox's criminal harassment trial, that Fox was requesting my visitation be cancelled completely but that's false. Fox was only requesting my visits be supervised, temporarily Order to Show Cause, 2012-11-27, page 2, item 4. And given those recent developments, that was a perfectly reasonable request. My incessant defense of Lauchner over the past year, knowing about Lauchner's arrests and meth use during that time, shows I was exercising incredibly bad judgment and putting myself and Lauchner before my children.

Fox received an email from me informing him I would be driving to Los Angeles to pick up Gabriel for his visitation with me, on 2012-12-16 email dated 2012-11-30 10:16 AM. The notice was sent and received more than two weeks prior to the travel time, and did not require any arrangements on Fox's end because I would be picking Gabriel up from their home. So Fox was agreeable with it.

On 2012-12-16, I arrived at their home in Los Angeles and picked up Gabriel. There was no interference, no games, no stupid nonsense or needless arguments or belligerence. Of course, in retrospect, Fox believes the only reason I was so agreeable this time is because I intended to do everything I could to make sure DHS would arrest and detain him while Gabriel was with me during the winter break, and then I would immediately file for emergency custody based on Fox being in custody and/or deported. Yeah, sounds about right.

So there you have it, every visitation, including the ones which were completely voluntary, before the family court was involved.

Fox has NEVER done anything to interfere with ANY of my visitation or my access to Gabriel.

Oh, I love to accuse Fox of messing with my visitation, but that's just my typical, delusional, narcissistic blame throwing. I mean, the proof is all right there in the emails. I admitted, at the criminal harassment trial, that the emails on the website are accurate and complete. We're not withholding anything.

And because there are so many people who refuse to believe a mother could ever be anything but loving and caring toward their children, I can keep insisting Fox has always interefered with all of my visitations, and you will continue to believe me.

Let me sneak this little anecdote in here, to give you a little more insight into the fucked up world-view of Desiree Capuano: After Fox was deported to Canada and he lost custody of Gabriel, he got Gabriel his own mobile phone so that he could have direct, unfettered contact with Gabriel. He paid for the phone and for the service. The service was with T-Mobile, but it didn't have international roaming so when Gabriel went to Canada to visit Fox, I wasn't able to call Gabriel on that phone. I actually got mad at Fox because I couldn't reach Gabriel on the phone that Fox was paying for. Fox told me I'm more than welcome to provide Gabriel a phone (or even just a Canadian SIM card which Gabriel can use in the phone Fox provided him), at my own expense, which will work in Canada so that I can have unfettered access to Gabriel when he visits Fox. I said that's ridiculous! Why would I pay for that? Oh, but it's okay for Fox to have to pay for that so Fox can have unfettered access to him? I argued with Fox, saying I shouldn't have to pay for an additional, second phone for Gabriel. So Fox told me I can also call Gabriel either on Fox's mobile or on the landline in Fox's apartment. I had some ridiculous, frivolous argument against that as well, but I don't remember what it was.

That was a couple days after Gabriel arrived in Vancouver. Then for the remaining six weeks of Gabriel's visit they never heard from me. It turns out the only reason I called a couple days after Gabriel arrived in Vancouver was because he hadn't called to let me know he arrived okay. I didn't actually care about speaking with Gabriel, I was only hoping Fox had absconded with him so I could call the police on him.