Request for confirmation
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Jul 30, 2012, 3:20 PM
Subject:
Request for confirmation
Desiree: Good afternoon. I wonder if you might be kind enough to confirm some information for me. I have a record of a Kristopher Michael Lauchner, DOB 7/7/1974, pleading guilty to a shoplifting charge on 1/10/2012. According to my records the offense occurred on or about 12/15/2011 in Peoria, AZ. Can you confirm the accuracy of that information? Thank you, Fox
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Jul 30, 2012, 3:35 PM
Subject:
Re: Request for confirmation
I have a report that you are working under another false name (alias). Can you confirm that?
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Jul 30, 2012, 4:26 PM
Subject:
Re: Request for confirmation
I am not able to confirm what you are requesting because it is not true. I am not working under another false name. The best I can say is submit your report as an exhibit and I can provide my rebuttal at the hearing. The purpose of my request for you to confirm the information regarding Lauchner's conviction for shoplifting on 1/10/12 is so that the matter will not have to be disputed when we return to court. If you choose not to comment or respond it just means that I will have to provide you a copy of the records that I have (as part of discovery) and provide a copy of those records for the court's review. The goal is to save the court's time. I'm not trying to be adversarial. I'm just going through the legal process. We, as parties to a case, have a duty to the court, as part of the discovery process, to attempt to determine, ahead of time, which matters are conceded and which are in dispute. So far you have refused to cooperate in the discovery process but I shall continue to comply with the Rules of Court. Fox
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Jul 30, 2012, 4:35 PM
Subject:
Re: Request for confirmation
I am not doing this with you. I will not go round and round with extensive emails that go nowhere. The best I can tell you is that if you discover something that you think is important, present it to the judge. It will be dealt with then.
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Jul 30, 2012, 5:21 PM
Subject:
Re: Request for confirmation
Desiree: Well, I asked a simple, direct question and you're the one being evasive and refusing to either admit or deny the claims, so if there is any round and round occurring it would seem to be coming from you. I provided a clear, direct response to YOUR request for admission. I cannot take your advise, though, about just presenting things I think are import, to the judge, because that is not how the legal process works (as I'm sure you'll find out if you take that approach). As I pointed out, the parties have an obligation to try to determine which issues are in dispute and I intend to comply with that obligation. The court is not going to accept "I didn't know I had to" as an justification for refusing to comply with the rules of court. Anyway, as required by the rules of discovery (Ca Civ Pro § 2016.010 et seq.) I am disclosing the reports I referred to earlier and will mail you a hard copy momentarily. I am doing so because it is explicitly required by the rules of court. Fox
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Jul 30, 2012, 8:29 PM
Subject:
Re: Request for confirmation
Desiree: In the report that you claim to have, just what name does it say I am working under? And would you be capable of providing a copy of such report? I always provide you copies of the artifacts I say I have. Also, I don't believe there is any law against using a pseudonym for professional purposes - actors and writers do it all the time. Thanks, Fox