Interesting
However you are accessing that incident report involving me I'm assuming is done under false pretense. You may have.., well it's not worth my time to speculate. What I'd like to impress upon you is I am very concerned with Scottsdale's disclosure of an on-going investigation (as you put it). I would like to offer you the opportunity to explain your motives in regards to your solicitation of anything involving me, and decide if that's an activity you plan on continuing. Being I am innocent of all allegations stemming from that incident and have not been formally charged with anything, I am a bit incensed by your invasion and the slanderous insinuations you've made as a result of the unlawful disclosure made by the SPD. I will research what actions I can take, but I will first inform you that I now feel threatened and harassed by you. Certainly not from any guilt, or association I have with anything illegal, do I perceive any threat; its from the intelligence you possess combined with your propensity to fabricate and manipulate the courts with complete confidence- and your clear discontent with me - that I fear you may attempt somehow to harm me and my family.. I will have no recourse other than legal (an action which I detest) should you persist with your interest in my life and activities. I am aware of your adversity to revisiting Phoenix, not to mention the municipal court system, and I do not want to cause you any more trouble than you're already causing yourself; but if you continue to misrepresent yourself in relation to me for the purpose of leverage or opportunity for causing me harm I will have no other choice. Sent from my iPhone <forgery arrest report 11-25802 DR.pdf>
Kristopher: All police reports are public records and can be obtained by anyone. The Scottsdale Police Department's investigation is complete, partially because the matter has been handed over to the Secrete Service for further investigation. It is the Secret Service that refused to release their reports due to the investigation being ongoing. According to the police reports you admitted to knowing that the notes were counterfeit; you used them to purchase multiple blue ray players in two days then returned those players at another location for cash; on at least one video from the WalMart there was a female with you (I'm assuming Desiree); and the police observed you tearing up one of the counterfeit bills. After they released you they discovered you had also attempted to pass counterfeit bills at other stores - contrary to the story you told about Jose and the pool cue. Charges have actually been filed - as you can see in the police report. The prosecutor has not sought an indictment yet - in part because the investigation is still ongoing and in part because there's a question of jurisdiction - counterfeit currency falls under the Secret Service and the US District Court, but forgery falls under the state Superior Court. Most likely they will settle on the District Court exercising jurisdiction or they will handle it as two separate cases with the forgery in the state court and the counterfeiting in the federal. Also, there's the issue of money laundering. See, by using counterfeit notes to purchase items at one store than returning them at another to obtain real/clean bills that would constitute money laundering under the federal definition. I'm not trying to scare or threaten you - I'm merely informing you of the facts and explaining the basis of my concerns about Gabriel being in your care. After all, Gabriel was in your care when you were arrested on November 1 and Desiree was almost arrested again at that time for having a pipe in her purse. That would have resulted in Gabriel being taken to...where? I have no discontent with you. I have concern for Gabriel's well-being. If you were not in a position to be taking care of Gabriel 375 miles away you would be completely irrelevant to me. I have no interest in causing you harm - I have an interest in keeping Gabriel safe, away from people using drugs, and away from people that may be violent. And quite frankly you use drugs, and you have a history of being violent, and you have as recently as November, been engaging in illegal activities (aside from your drug use). And I believe that you (and Desiree) are still engaging in illegal activity. And, as long as you are residing in the same domicile as Gabriel and being left alone with Gabriel I will continue to investigate and monitor your activities. Finally, I have no fear or aversion to going to Arizona and I think that yours and Desiree's belief that I would is simply silly. I can think of no reason why I should be afraid to go to Arizona. The warrant that you guys keep bringing up is a misdemeanor that the court could have had me transferred back from Eloy to Phoenix for but they didn't because they know the case is bullshit and the charge will be dismissed. The reason I do not go to Arizona is because right now I do not have the financial resources and, also, I have no reason to.
What is the basis for your assertions of drug use? I do not use any type of drug and haven't for many years. I would guess longer than your present duration of abstinence. You seem to easily (and conveniently) exclude your own admissions of drug use and transgressions of the law. I admit I have used poor judgment and have exhibited naïveté that would not seem befitting someone with my past. Your mistrust is justified given the circumstantial evidence you've based it on, I don't dismiss it's merit. But it would seem you of all people, should be aware of the process of reporting by the police.. And how incredibly bias to their agenda it often is. Also I'm sure the term "trumped" charges and the purpose behind them is not foreign to you either. But of course your charge here is "bullshit", while the incident involving myself you've deemed to be a true. Decidedly naive... Or bias? That distinction really doesn't matter as they both are related to your opinion. I was more interested in your agenda disclosing what you think might be withheld or restricted information to Desiree; or more pointedly what you think it might achieve? Sent from my iPhone
My presumption that you are using drugs is based, in part, on the fact that Desiree is using drugs and you are in a relationship with her and live with her. Statistically, it is very rare that a non-drug user stays in a relationship with a drug user. I do not have unequivocal evidence of your drug use yet, however, one of my highest priorities as soon as I start a project will be hiring an investigator and I'm sure he will uncover such evidence if it exists. In the meantime I shall continue to believe that you are using drugs because you are in a relationship with a person who openly admits to using drugs. But as far as my concern about Gabriel's safety, the fact that Desiree is using drugs is enough - whether or not you are is redundant. As for my agenda in disclosing the information about the reports and investigations - I don't have an agenda. I was sharing some of the information that I have so that you and Desiree would try to be a little careful and cautious while Gabriel is out there because I don't want a recurrence of November 1. As far as the investigations and the prosecutions, they are going to happen regardless of anything I do. I don't see what I would have to gain by informing you and her of them. In fact, I would much rather keep you both in the dark, let warrants get issued then laugh when the MCSO puts your respective mug shots on their web site. And based on my experience dealing with the MCAO they ARE going to find out about Desiree's prior from California (not because 'm going to say anything, just because eventually her fingerprints will match up, or she has already admitted in court here that she did use the name Virginia Tomlin for that conviction so it will be added to her NCIC report as an alias which will result in the MCAO stumbling across the conviction record) and that WILL, statutorily, disqualify her from prop 200. And, I challenge you to produce any admission on my part of drug use. You are probably referring to the letter I sent Gabriel that Desiree has repeatedly relied upon in court. The "drug use" in question may very well have been caffeine, alcohol, and nicotine. Those ARE drugs. And I have used them regularly for a large part of my life. If you're going to suggest I have had any kind of drug problem I think you'll need something a little stronger than that. Fox
Fair enough Fox. My life is quite full enough at the moment for me to play semantics with someone who clearly has an empty schedule perfectly suited for such useless endeavors. It's funny to me how transparent you really are. But whatever, I hardly expected you to act like a man and speak Sent from my iPhone