Over the past few years, Fox has dealt with Desiree in adversarial roles extensively. Yet, he has always been able to use the same tactic against her, without fail.
Most people would realize, at some point, that the approach their using keeps backfiring on them and they keep ending up worse off than before. But not Desiree. Desiree really only has two tactics in her repertoire: lying; and manipulating people into feeling sorry for her. The manipulation, she's quite good at. The lying, well, she's never been able to quite figure out how to do that effectively.
You see, Desiree's problem when it comes to lying is that she has a tendency to change her stories from one minute to the next. Often, completely contradicting herself. Case in point, one day she told the Sahuarita Police that Fox has never threatened her; the next day she called the RCMP and told them Fox threatened to kill her; a few months later she testified under oath that Fox has never threatened her; then, a month later she testified under oath in the family court that Fox threatened to kill her. The alleged threat allegedly occurred in January 2015 - long before she started ping-ponging on whether or not it actually ever happened. Then, she went on television and claimed, again, that Fox threatened to kill her, and that none of the police or courts had been willing to help her.
So, how does one, such as Fox, defend against the barrage of false allegations from a psycho like Desiree? And how does one retaliate against such a bipolar schizo?
In the case of Desiree, she makes it incredibly easy, because she goes on the record and makes her outrageous claims in such a way that they are thoroughly documented. Such that she cannot, possibly, claim she never made them. You would think that by now she would realize that Fox is going to obtain and publish all those police reports, court documents, recordings, and videos. I mean, he's been doing that since 2011.
Yet, somehow, Desiree continues to behave as though people are only going to believe what she wants them to believe - regardless of what she said last week, or last month.
So what Fox does is he keeps all of the proof that Desiree's lying, and he sits on it. He doesn't publish it proactively. He waits until Desiree makes such outrageous, false claims, publicly or under oath, or on the record, then he publishes the proof that she lied.
Why does he do it that way? Why doesn't he just publish everything up front, so that she doesn't have a chance to make her false allegations in the first place? Because if he did that then the world would never see just how much of a psychotic, manipulative, compulsive liar she is.
Consider: If this website had already contained proof refuting all of the claims Desiree made on TV in February 2015, then the CBC probably would not have run their story and no one would have heard about this website or about Desiree. By withholding the proof that Desiree was full of shit until after the story ran, a whole bunch of people got suckered and and taken advantage of by Desiree - then they found out she had lied to them. That way, they don't just see her as just a liar - they see her as a liar that lied to them, that deliberately took advantage of them. And that pisses them off a hell of a lot more.
As I've said, so far this tactic has worked without fail. Desiree continues to lie to people, then I continue to prove to them that she lied. It seems strange to me that after all these years she continues to do things that keep backfiring on her. But then, I guess that's just one of the characteristics of a true sociopath, isn't it?
Comments