Notice of Service in the California case
From:
To:
Date:
Sat, Jun 27, 2015, 9:54 AM
Subject:
Notice of Service in the California case
Desiree: I see on the California court's web site that you filed a declaration and submitted a notice of service. I was, most certainly, not served anything regarding that case. If you continue to try to execute service by mail, using a name which is not my legal name then the court is just going to have to order that all future service be by a process server - which, of course, is going to cost you a lot more money. Why do you keep trying to play stupid games that just keep backfiring on you? Fox P.S. Please serve a copy of your declaration on me before I have to notify the court that you've submitted false a Notice of Service.
From:
To:
Date:
Sun, Jun 28, 2015, 8:22 PM
Subject:
Re: Notice of Service in the California case
Let me make this perfectly clear as I will not waiver. If you wish to be addressed as Patrick Fox then you need to go to court and have your name updated on the court order. You will then need to update Gabriel's birth certificate to reflect the name Patrick Fox. Until that time I will ONLY send legal documentation pertaining to the custody order to Richard Riess and you will accept it. If you have a problem with it, I suggest you file something with the court in California as I have NO problem staring my case before the commissioner. Do you understand?
From:
To:
Date:
Sun, Jun 28, 2015, 8:29 PM
Subject:
Re: Notice of Service in the California case
Actually, you're wrong about each of those things you stated. I'm not required to do ANY of those things. And as long as you've acknowledged, in writing, that you know my legal name is Patrick Fox, then attempting to server me under another name fails to meet the requirements of legal service. Regarding the custody order: since I have no legal or physical custody then the name on the order is irrelevant.