More of what I know
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Thu, May 07, 2015, 1:07 PM
Subject:
More of what I know
Desiree: I also know that you don't want to let Gabriel visit with me because you know that when he visits we bond more and that puts more distance "emotionally" between you and him; yet you don't want to explicitly refuse to let him visit because you know that he will resent you for it. So, you're trying to create a situation whereby you can say it was because of me that he couldn't visit. But I've explained to him that my mother used to do the same stuff when I was a kid. That my father eventually stopped coming to visit and I learned later in life that it was because of the games my mother would play - the same stuff you're doing right now. As always, your scheme won't work. The only way it could would be if you completely cut off communication between Gabriel and I and made it so he could only hear your version of events. But there's no way you can do that without grossly upsetting the court and Gabriel. And your versions of events always rely on the listener's pity and sense of guilt. Eventually, people get tired of hearing about how someone is always such a victim because in reality most of the problems in our lives are the result of our own actions and the only people that don't realize that are the ones that are always trying to blame others for their problems - people like you. Fox
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Thu, May 07, 2015, 1:15 PM
Subject:
Re: More of what I know
Desiree: By the way, I know you don't deal well with reality, so I don't expect you to respond sincerely to these most recent messages. Fox
Oh you little man. I don't fear you or Gabriel opinion of me. I am also not preventing visitation. Try as you might to get me to say 'no' I will not do it.
Yesterday, in your email timestamped 5:58pm, you stated:That seems pretty clear to me that you are saying if I do not provide Gabriel's return flight information then you will not allow him to travel and, hence you will not allow him to visit. Now you seem to be saying that no matter what I do you will not "say 'no'", by which I assume you mean about allowing him to visit. So, what you're saying today completely contradicts what you said yesterday. Once again, you have defeated yourself! I don't believe I said you had any concern for my or Gabriel's opinion of you. I don't believe you care about anyone's opinion of you because you're far to self absorbed for that. And Gabriel and I believe in things like accountability, which is completely contrary to your view of life. Fox"If I do not have a travel itinerary for Gabriel's return flight to Phoenix on July 12th, 2015 then he will not board a plan to travel anywhere. Are you still unclear as to my meaning?"
Desiree: If your position is that you are going to allow Gabriel to visit and there's nothing I can do to make you refuse to allow him to visit, then why are we even having all of this communication? Why is it that you don't just shut up and fuck off, and let that be the end of it? On my end, the purpose of the communication revolves around Gabriel being able to come to Vancouver for part of the summer so that I can fulfill my duties to him as his father. You seem to be arguing about the same thing, however now you're saying that you're going to allow him to come and there's nothing I can do to make you NOT allow it. So, what the fuck are we talking for then? If you're going to allow Gabriel to visit then there is nothing further for us to say to each other. Anything I could possibly want to say to or about you I'd rather post on your web site, anyway. Fox
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, May 11, 2015, 10:40 AM
Subject:
Re: More of what I know
oh, don't you know? I'm trying to play right into your plan of turning Gabriel against me by showing him how you never get annoyed..."Why is it that you don't just shut up and fuck off" - clearly not annoyed.
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, May 11, 2015, 10:56 AM
Subject:
Re: More of what I know
Desiree: Admittedly, yes, I am quickly annoyed by stupidity. Fox
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, May 11, 2015, 10:59 AM
Subject:
Re: More of what I know
Oh but you can't possibly be annoyed Richard...annoyance is an emotion... (from http://dictionary.reference.com) annoyance [uh-noi-uh ns] Spell Syllables Examples Word Origin noun 1. a person or thing that annoys; nuisance: 2. an act or instance of annoying. *3. the feeling of being annoyed.*
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, May 11, 2015, 11:23 AM
Subject:
Re: More of what I know
Desiree:
You're incorrect (again). Annoyance is not an emotion. It is a mental
state characterized by irritation and distraction. Annoyance can lead
to frustration and anger (anger can be considered an emotion).
Annoyance is a potential cause of an emotion (or emotional state) - it
is not, itself, an emotion. For more information you can refer to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annoyance
But you bring up a good point: you insistence that "annoyance" is an
emotion, when it's actually the *cause* (or more specifically, catalyst)
of an emotional response, is unequivocal proof that you are incapable of
distinguishing a cause from an effect - just as I had stated you are, a
few days ago. Thank you for proving my point.
I also point out that the term "feeling" uses, in it's definition, the
term "emotion", which uses in it's definition, the term "feeling". That
is a circular reference. You do know what a circular reference is,
right? You do understand that if two terms (whether in diction or in
math) depend on each other such that they create a circular reference
then neither term can ever actually be resolved. Wasn't logic covered
in your bachelors curriculum?
Fox
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, May 11, 2015, 11:30 AM
Subject:
Re: More of what I know
Oh, so in this case dictionary.com isn't good enough because it would make you wrong about something right? I get it.
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, May 11, 2015, 11:39 AM
Subject:
Re: More of what I know
No. A dictionary provides the definitions of words. In some cases, like feeling and emotions, there can be no definition due to the circular reference. So, we have to look past the word and consider the concept which the word attempts to embody. You're really making yourself look incredibly unintelligent here. Consider you have a bachelors degree (albeit, a pseudo one) and I have grade 8. You're really impressing the world with your wit and intellect. Thank god we get to put these wonderful discussions on your website. Fox
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, May 11, 2015, 11:44 AM
Subject:
Re: More of what I know
this has been fun...really. I understand you think you 'won' your argument and you have proven once again to show how ignorant I am and are gloating about how the whole world is going to see me for the way I really am. You keep thinking that. You arrogance and ignorance will be your undoing. I am a very patient person :-) Talk to you later :-)
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, May 11, 2015, 12:13 PM
Subject:
Re: More of what I know
Desiree: In point of fact, you are NOT a very patient person. You become emotional and act irrationally and say things without thinking them through. You do things without considering the potential consequence. That is why your actions usually backfire on you. I think it is clear that I *HAVE* won the arguments. I have successfully proven each of your statements either incorrect or moot. You have not proven any of my statements incorrect or moot. Therefore, yes, I have indeed won the arguments. There is no evidence to support a claim that I am arrogant or ignorant. In fact, if anything, these discussions today only prove the opposite - that *YOU* are the arrogant one (for thinking that you're something significant when there is no basis for such), and phenomenally ignorant (your words make that abundantly clear). Later, Fox