Gabriel's Spring Break
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, Jan 27, 2015, 9:32 PM
Subject:
Gabriel's Spring Break
Desiree: Gabriel told me tonight that he would like to come to Vancouver, to visit with me during his Spring Break, which runs from March 7, 2015 through March 15, 2015, but that he didn't think you'd agree to it. I'm done with showing him what you're like when there's no court orders in place so we will be returning to court shortly. In the meantime may you provide your written consent for Gabriel to spend his Spring Break with me in Vancouver? If you decline, I will have my attorney schedule a hearing for the matter and we both know the court is going to order you to allow him to visit, being that he hasn't seen me since the beginning of January. If I don't receive your written response by January 31, 2015 then I'll assume you refuse consent. Sincerely, Fox
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Wed, Jan 28, 2015, 6:41 AM
Subject:
Re: Gabriel's Spring Break
Richard, The answer to your demand (that was not a request) is no. Let me repeat that since you never get it the first time. No, Gabriel may NOT visit during his Spring Break as plans have already been made. Reasonable visitation does not mean that I am required to jump whenever you snap your fingers or send Gabriel at every one of his vacations. It is SUPPOSED to be a negotiation. We already have family plans over Spring Break and Gabriel already knows this or should. My behavior now is absolutely no different than before you declared in open court that you wished to relinquish all parental rights to Gabriel. Another unfounded baseless accusation. Good job. ~ Desiree
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Wed, Jan 28, 2015, 7:20 AM
Subject:
Re: Gabriel's Spring Break
Desiree: Neither I, nor Gabriel, care about your plans. Gabriel is aware that you have already made plans for the Spring Break, but still he would rather visit me then spend it with you. When Gabriel was with me I allowed him to set the visitation schedule, which resulted in him spending every one of his extended school breaks with you even though it meant I was never able to take any trips with him. That is because, unlike you, I actually DO respect his wishes. Anyway, the point of the request was to prove, once again, that I am a better person and a better parent - because I put Gabriel's desires with respect to visitation before mine; and because, unlike you, I have never interferred with Gabriel's desire to visit with you. Once again, you have been played. You have manipulated into admitted exactly what I wanted you to. Thank you for being so easy to control. By the way, you never provided a copy of the Order and Finding After Hearing which was filed by one on August 1, 2015. One last suggestion about good parenting: one you're upset about something, say like our debates, you really shouldn't take it out on your children. That's very bad parenting. Fox
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Wed, Jan 28, 2015, 10:22 AM
Subject:
Re: Gabriel's Spring Break
Desiree: For the record, I phrased it as a "demand" (to use your words) deliberately, because I knew that would significantly increase the probability that you would say no. You're just so easy sometimes. Fox
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Wed, Jan 28, 2015, 7:59 PM
Subject:
Re: Gabriel's Spring Break
Desiree: Sorry, I forgot that you're usually a little slow on matters of strategy. I'll explain: Gabriel's visits with me are for his benefit, not mine. Therefore, if I ask for your consent for Gabriel to visit at any time, I am asking for Gabriel, not me. Since I am not the beneficiary of your consent then it should make no difference how I phrase the request. If you take offense to the way a person asks for something for themselves, then of course, you are right to refuse. However, since I am asking for Gabriel - not myself, your refusal based on how I presented the request means that you are refusing Gabriel because you are upset with me. Understand now? In other words, you would take it out on Gabriel because you don't like the way I asked. Have you ever actually done ANYTHING right? No, really, I'm serious. Fox
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Wed, Jan 28, 2015, 8:55 PM
Subject:
Re: Gabriel's Spring Break
Ricky, I can clearly see I hurt your(supposedly non-existent) feelings with the previous e-mail response. Let me again clarify since you obviously can't or won't read for comprehension. Your rude demanding response was never a factor in the decision. As I clearly pointed out, we already have plans for that period of time. Gabriel knows this. Therefore the answer is no. With such a myopic and distorted point of view coupled with a now documented inability to read and comprehend, I am truly astounded that you can maintain a technical position of any sort. I'd assume the vast majority of bugs in the products you work on must have you to thank. Do you pawn off the interns? Good job. I'll also assume you forge your own references, as that makes the most sense given your long history of lies and existing arrest for forgery/ passing bad checks. Do you do voices when they call to speak to one of your fictitious references? I'll assume so as well. As for your other immature tantrums(four by my count), all I can see is, "I'm going to lie about a bunch of stuff, fabricate details, then blame you for them because my mommy never loved me. That is your fault too. Please pay attention to my pathetic attempts to gain your attention." As such, a blanket denial about everything you say being the result of your ongoing struggle with addiction to meth and other substances seems appropriate. You are wrong as usual. On a bright note, I did show the photo below to your father. He stated that while there is a striking resemblance to his son, he could not be certain this was him:Perhaps you are not as entirely full of crap as you seem to be all the time. As always, please go find someone or some thing to fill that gaping hole I left in your life. It has been long enough, and is pretty pathetic at this point. Please grow up, Richard Riess... ~ Desiree
Attachments:
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Wed, Jan 28, 2015, 10:00 PM
Subject:
Re: Gabriel's Spring Break
You didn't hurt my feelings (assuming, for the sake of argument, that "feelings" even exist). I was in a hurry when I provided the earlier response and realized later that you would probably misinterpret it and say something moronic which I would correct you on, after the fact (that's our usual exchange, anyway). I didn't fail to comprehend anything you had stated in your prior message. I was being proactive, anticipating what your response would be. Regarding the quality of my work: you're free to contact either my current, or any of my prior supervisors, who will tell you that the quality of my work is consistently exceptional. In fact, ALL of the bugs in the current product have been introduced by the team in China and by one or two of the junior developers on the team in Canada. The project manager usually assigns the more complex, system and architecture level issues to me. Go ahead and call. My current supervisors are Erick Feng and Tyler Goodbrand. in fact, why don't you speak with Neng Xu - the president of the Canadian office. I'll get you the number when I get to the office tomorrow. The rest of your message is your usual idiotic nonsense - claims with no evidence, arguing points that have already been proven false, et cetera and doesn't justify the time it would take to respond. Have you EVER had ANYTHING intelligent to say which wasn't just repeating what you heard someone else say? There was no photo attached - but either way, it doesn't matter - I know what I look like and I know exactly what Steve Riess would say if you sent him my picture. Please provide the definition of "tantrum" which you have used repeatedly. I suspect you are misusing it. For such a racist, immigrant hating person as yourself, you don't seem to have a very good grasp of your own language. Good evening, Fox
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Thu, Jan 29, 2015, 10:00 AM
Subject:
Re: Gabriel's Spring Break
Desiree: The number here (at IGG) is 604-879-8861. Go ahead inquire about my skill level. Of course, we both know you won't. Fox
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Wed, Feb 04, 2015, 7:46 AM
Subject:
Re: Gabriel's Spring Break
Desiree: I'm going to go ahead and assume, then, that you're not going to check my references, and that it's because your remarks about my professional capabilities and competence are just more of your endless attempts to try (in vain) to insult me. Good day, Fox
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Wed, Jan 28, 2015, 10:17 PM
Subject:
Re: Gabriel's Spring Break
Desiree: I find it curious that you focus all your efforts on trying to attack me personally by attempting to belittle me but your claims never have anything to do with my parenting. Aren't all of my attacks on you about how bad of a parent you are? And why is it that I always provide specific examples and explanations to backup my claims about you but you never do that for your claims about me? And why do you keep trying to insult me with the same tired remarks that so far have failed to have any effect (e.g. calling me a compulsive liar, saying I'm not a US citizen, questioning my intellect, calling me Richard or Ricky, et cetera)? You're starting to seem kind of impotent. Fox