Restrictions on Gabriel's use of the financial support
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014, 8:55 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Sun, Sep 07, 2014, 8:55 PM
Subject:
Restrictions on Gabriel's use of the financial support
Desiree: I put this request in a separate email so that your response does not get mixed in with the other matter we are currently discussing. Have you imposed upon Gabriel any restrictions, or limitations, on how he may spend the financial support I have been providing him? Fox
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014, 8:21 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Mon, Sep 08, 2014, 8:21 AM
Subject:
Re: Restrictions on Gabriel's use of the financial support
Gabriel can SPEND the money you give him on whatever he wishes. However, that does not guarantee any sort of results. For example: Should Gabriel choose purchase something that is not allowed in the house, he would need to consider the logistics of where/how to store said item to protect it from factors such as theft and weather. Though I'm not sure that buried treasure and maps would prove as effective in today's society as it once did. Especially if that something is a puppy.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014, 8:37 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Mon, Sep 08, 2014, 8:37 PM
Subject:
Re: Restrictions on Gabriel's use of the financial support
May you please provide Gabriel and me a list, or at least examples, of what types of items which would not be "allowed" in your house? Fox
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014, 8:06 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Tue, Sep 09, 2014, 8:06 AM
Subject:
Re: Restrictions on Gabriel's use of the financial support
Richard, You asked the question, so you obviously have something specific in mind. Cut to the chase here. I am under no obligation to furnish you with a list of allowed items in my home. Nor am I under any obligation to discuss rules relating to parenting of Gabriel with you. Especially since you willingly relinquished all parental rights. If Gabriel wishes to have a conversation with me directly, that is his right, and I fully encourage that open dialogue. If you are attempting to be vague in an effort to skirt a known prohibited item, let me help you be direct. If this discussion is focused around a Playstation 4, you know that answer is no. Period.
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014, 8:43 AM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Tue, Sep 09, 2014, 8:43 AM
Subject:
Re: Restrictions on Gabriel's use of the financial support
Desiree: I am attempting to obtain some type of guideline, some rule which I may use to determine what kinds of things Gabriel is "permitted" under your totalitarian regime, to possess while he is in your home so that I don't need to bother with begging for your approval on an individual basis. Over the past few months you have ignored almost all of my requests regarding whether Gabriel would be permitted to have specific items (for example, an upgraded notebook, a MacBook). Regarding the PS4, how could I possibly know that that would be on the "forbidden" list? You never actually stated, prior to this, that it was...and you permitted him to have the one I got him for his last birthday. So, why was he allowed to have one last year, but not this year? What is the logic? That is why I would like something in writing: there is no logic, no reasoning, and no consistency to your decisions. You change your mind from one day to the next and don't even provide a justification for the change. May you please clarify the significance of the interjection "Period" at the end of your previous message? It immediately follows an actual period, so it seems somewhat redundant. But, moreover, it is not followed by an exclamation mark, so it is clearly not intended for emphasis. I protest you are the one being vague! Fox
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014, 12:05 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Tue, Sep 09, 2014, 12:05 PM
Subject:
Re: Restrictions on Gabriel's use of the financial support
Richard, I am sorry that you are unable to understand. Have a nice day. :)