Usage graphs and access statistics
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014, 7:45 AM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Jul 24, 2014, 7:45 AM
Subject:
Usage graphs and access statistics
Desiree: As promised, here are the usage graphs for the site, showing the spikes which follow each time something was published about you. The graphs are generated automatically by the hosting provider. You probably think I'm making the whole thing up, as if I have that much time to kill. If I did have that much free time I think I'd spend it uploading the audio recordings of our family court hearings, or scanning and uploading the court documents and transcripts, or generally imrpoving the overall presentation. You'll notice from the generally low access numbers that, generally, people don't care about you, but whenever they get a reminder of your existence then they gotta check it out - perhaps for a good laugh or to see how the other half lives (do you notice people looking down their noses at you since late January?). And to further support my "theory" that your "friends" will be nice to your face while talking shit behind your back, consider: I have not received a single critical email. Not one of your supposed supporters has bothered to chastise me for being such a prick. That's how much your friends and coworkers care about you. A quick scan of the log reports shows the following are some of the most frequently accessed URLs: / /media/declaration_of_income_and_expenses-2014-01.pdf /apollo_group/ /mail/ /pictures/ /media/mugshot-marijuana_possession.pdf /media/arrest_report-11-22639_DR_09-27-11.pdf /media/arrest_report_11-25802_DR_11-01-11.pdf /media/santa_monica_conviction.pdf /pictures/IMG_0086.JPG (the picture of you in bed) /pictures/IMG_0346.JPG /media/2011-09-27_arrest_abridged.mp3 There also seems to be a lot of interest in the pictures of your bedroom. But as you say, you don't actually read my emails anymore so you're not reading any of this. If I ever find the time, I'm thinking about adding a page where your "friends" can post comments. I'm also thinking about posting the supportive responses I've received from your "friends" referring to you as a "monster", "shameless", "a child", et cetera...if memory serves correctly, I believe one even referred to you as "disgusting" and "giving single mothers a bad name". But I wouldn't want to cause problems for them or betray their annonymity.