Gabriel's package
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013, 6:47 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Desiree: I called the post office today to verify the package was out for delivery, because the web site only shows the one attempt last Saturday and now the tracking information is no longer being updated, and they said they had no record of anyone calling to make arrangements for redelivery. They said that it was supposed to be picked up by the 17th (5 days after the first delivery attempt) and that she thinks it's already been sent back. Fox
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013, 8:40 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
I have the confirmation number. I will be calling them back tomorrow. If you would have told me you were going to call, I would have given you the re-delivery confirmation number.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013, 8:45 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
USPS 800-275-8777 Tracking number EM022587778CA 10:45am on October 12th (first attempt) Friday Oct 18 (scheduled redelivery) LOR26289716 (confirmation) As well, I will go pick up the package but they left no receipt the first time so I don't know where the took it (which post office). I will find that out tomorrow when I call.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013, 7:21 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
So, how did it go at the Post Office?
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013, 1:36 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
They are stupid. They said they printed the label for the redelivery but there was a new person and that it is still in the process of being delivered even though it didn't come Friday or yesterday. I'll be going back again on Monday. Did you call them again with the confirmation number? Did they tell you anything different? They better not have mail it back to you - I'll be pissed.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013, 1:46 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Yes, I called them with the confirmation number. Yes, they told me something different from what you are stating.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013, 2:07 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
But didn't you say you were going to go pick it up? The post office is only 2.3 miles from your place. The drive time is 6 minutes.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013, 9:59 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
I went to the post office in person Fox. The package wasn't there. The lady at the counter told me it was "most likely" on the delivery truck and should be at my house that day. That was Saturday. She told me her manager printed the re-order label on Friday.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013, 8:25 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Since this is the third package not to reach Gabriel, in the past month (after the video game from Amazon, and the second to last gift card I had Liz send him); and since the post office claims to have no record of your call to schedule redelivery, I will consider it part of the ongoing pattern of deliberate attempts on your part, to prevent me from communicating, bonding, and maintaining a caring relationship with Gabriel. Moving forward, unless what you have to say is related to Gabriel's well-being, I would ask that you deal with my attorney, rather than contacting me directly. His contact information is: Horacio Lozano 14717 Hawthorne Blvd, Suite F Lawndale, CA 90260 310-675-2995 lozanolawoffice@yahoo.com Sincerely, Fox
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013, 11:13 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
There have been 2 packages that Gabriel has not received. The video game and this one. The package from Liz was not sent by her when you accused me of tampering with it and since she sent it he has received it. The ratio of packages he HAS received vs those he has not is huge, however - I fully expect you to blame this on me. I would rather deal with your attorney than you any day of the week.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013, 11:21 AM, Patrick Fox wrote:
The first time Liz sent the package with the gift card it was returned to her as "return to sender". I had her keep the envelope with the post marks on it and forward it to my attorney as evidence. When Gabriel did receive the gift card it was the SECOND time she sent it. There have been numerous packages that have arrived without problems, but I'm talking about the past month. It seems a couple of weeks before Gabriel's birthday you started playing these games. And, yes, here I am blatantly accusing you of interfering with my mail to him! And, if you would rather deal with my attorney then why are you emailing me? That's a rhetorical question. Please don't use it as an excuse to respond. Fox
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013, 1:35 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
Since you started the conversation with me I'll finish it with you - I left work early, went to the damn post office, stood there for an hour arguing with them until they finally found the package in the back. It's sitting on Gabriel's bed in his room, the same place I put ALL of his mail. This is the last time I'm going to tell you to stop accusing me of withholding his mail or interfering with your communication. Other people make mistakes too.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013, 1:41 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
I see no evidence to support what you are telling me and, since you have shown yourself to be a vindictive, compulsive liar, I see no reason to give you the benefit of the doubt. Other people DO make mistakes - it just seems to happen much more frequently with some people (e.g. you) than with others. Regarding me accusing you of withholding Gabriel's mail: But I have documentary proof of you doing it in the past. In February he received all of my letters at one time - immediately after the court told you not to withhold them. That means for a month and a half you withheld them. I also have your own confessions and statements that you will do whatever you can to make sure I will not be part of his life any longer. Are we done now? Fox
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013, 4:51 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
Whatever you say
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013, 10:03 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
I have confirmed Gabriel has received the package I sent him. And I shall be sending him another package with more essentials and gifts tomorrow. And, if the court rules that Gabriel must remain in Arizona, beyond the end of the current school term (mid-December) I shall be getting him his own desk for his room, proper bedding, a surround sound system for his room, an Xbox One and PS4 for his room, and whatever other things he may need or want. Some of these items are somewhat pricey, so I have ask that you, please, not let that other child of yours mess with them - I understand he has some behavioral issues and I wouldn't want him breaking Gabriel's things. Perhaps, maybe you could get a lock for Gabriel's bedroom door and you and Gabriel can have the keys? Just a thought. He will also soon be receiving the credit card I got for him. That card is to be used, by him, and him exclusively, to cover his expenses. May you please send me his clothing sizes so that I may get him some proper clothes? I've asked him but he keeps forgetting. I should like to get him some Ralph Lauren shirts; maybe some Doc Martens; a leather jacket might be cool. And please accept my apologies if I am causing a disparity between Gabriel and that other kid. It's not my intention, but at the same time, I cannot bring myself to make MY child go without just to save the feelings some other child. Boy, it's a good thing for Gabriel that I'm not like some parents - refusing to provide anything for their child when he's not with her, just to try to spite the other parent. And with that, I bid you good evening, Miss Capuano. I must take 45 minutes to watch an episode of NYPD Blue. Fox
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 7:10 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
That other kid his Gabriel's brother and his name is Sage. Don't take out your hostility and lack of humanity on a child - Sage has done nothing. I would never allow Micgael to speak that way about Gabriel and it is not right that you speak of Sage that way. If any of those expensive luxury items cause issues with school, behavior, or attitude I will take them from him until he learns and then they will be returned to him. It's part of being a responsible parent. He is not in college an his room is not a dorm.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 7:47 AM, Patrick Fox wrote:
There seems to be a misunderstanding. I mean, I understand your other kid, not Gabriel, has behavioral issues. Why would you take away Gabriel's things because Sage has no respect for Gabriel's things. That just doesn't make any sense. And, it is incorrect to refer to your other child as Gabriel's "brother". That would require that they both have the same parents (plural). Yet, they have different fathers. So Sage is merely Gabriel's half-brother. And, there is no hostility. I'm only speaking the truth. He is your "other child", the child which is not Gabriel, is he not? You're the one reading more into it. You have no control over how I, or Michael, speak of anyone or anything. Go ahead, though, if you wish, get mad at me and yell at me if it makes you feel better. Wait...so that I'm clear on the issue here...you're upset because I referred to that other kid that came out of your womb and is the product of your other failed marriage, and who happens to currently share a dwelling with Gabriel (against Gabriel's will, I might add), as "that other child"? But he IS "that other child"! So, you're mad about reality? Now, back to behavioral issues: Gabriel has never had behavioral issues and if he is exhibiting any now they would have to be things he has picked up since being with you. Though, that would have to be expected as a child is a product of their environment. It is inevitable that after being in an environment for some time a child will begin to adapt and adopt the behavior of their surroundings. It's basic survival. Though, I speak with him, frequently, about this very topic and urge him not to assimilate into that culture. Anyway, I have complete confidence that Gabriel will remain dignified and honorable as long as he accepts his current plight as temporary. And don't speak to me about being a responsible parent! A responsible parent does not allow a 12 year old to stay up until 5:30am playing video games. A responsible parent does not spend their money on marijuana instead of taking their child to the dentist or doctor. A responsible parent does not get involved in a committed relationship with a dangerous, meth using felon and have that dangerous, meth using felon look after her children. Responsible parent my ass. Who they hell do you think you're kidding? Being in college has nothing to do with it. Gabriel has, and is going to receive a lot more, expensive things that that other child will never be able to have because HIS (Sage's) parents do not have the means or the interest to provide them. And I don't want your other mistake (yes, having children at the age of 19 and 22 IS a mistake), benefiting from my work and efforts, or from Gabriel having at least one caring and responsible parent (I'm referring to me). And I don't want that sad attempt at gaining unconditional love (why else would have make the same mistake twice) to be breaking or stealing Gabriel's things. And don't try to tell me he's not like that, I hear all about it. Now, don't try for even a second, to pretend that Gabriel and Sage are on the same level, socially, intellectually, or otherwise. They are not and they never will be. And not because Gabriel is my child and Sage isn't. Gabriel is respectful, intelligent, and well mannered. Sage can't control his temper, he speaks poorly, has no respect for other people or their property. But, as I said, a child is the product of his environment. I don't blame Sage. He never had a chance because he can only know the environment he was born into and grew up in. I, like any intelligent responsible parent, blame the parents. Now I have to get ready for work. Have a great day being what you consider a responsible parent. Way to look after your children's teeth and health there. And I'm sure you have a nice big savings set aside for Gabriel's and Sage's education (I mean university) funds, right? Responsible, my ass! Fox
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 7:52 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
I know you misunderstand.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 8:14 AM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Either you're being sarcastic, or you're retarded. I guess it's true that ANYONE can get a degree from the University of Phoenix. That's probably why their degrees don't mean anything.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 8:37 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
I suppose, but I didn't get my degree from UOP - so now who's retarded.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 8:44 AM, Patrick Fox wrote:
I'm not talking about the community college thing you have; I'm talking about that other thing you've been working on since you've been at Apollo. And I don't see how not knowing which non-credible post secondary institute you attended would be an indication of mental retardation. "Retard" means "slow". Where's the connection? Oh, my God, I'm sorry - I didn't realize you actually were "retarded". Sorry, my bad. Now, I'm at work. I can't deal with your silly banter right now. Maybe when I get home tonight. Sincerely, Fox
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 10:24 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
wow - you're not usually so nasty...did I get under your skin Dick?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 11:01 AM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Not being nasty; just saying what I believe to be true. But, sometimes the truth IS painful, I guess. Calling me Dick doesn't bother me. In fact, no insults from you bother me, really. But, in this case Dick is a variant of Richard and also slang for the male reproductive organ, and a term to indicate you think poorly of the person. So, okay, in your opinion I am "Dick". That's fine.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 11:11 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
Ditto on the insults and I think much worse of you than just that. On to important people and things now. Please don't contact me any further as you have an attorney now.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 11:14 AM, Patrick Fox wrote:
That's fine. Just stop interfering with my mail to Gabriel and please keep that other offspring of yours away from the things that I am providing for Gabriel. Thanks, Dick
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 11:14 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
you don't get to dictate anything that happens in my home. If you don't like it - don't send anything.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, 11:15 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
and I have NEVER interfered with his packages.