Gabriel's passport
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013, 10:22 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Desiree: Please accept this as my formal request for you to apply for Gabriel's passport. Thank you, Fox
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013, 10:42 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
I thought you said he wouldn't need one.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013, 10:58 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
Regardless, you will need to complete form DS-3053 and provide it to me before I can comply with your formal request.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013, 11:05 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
There is a current, albeit temporary, court order in place granting you sole legal custody. You do not require my consent or a completed DS-3053. Gabriel does not require a US passport to travel from the US to Canada; however, he me experience complications or delays if flying from Canada to the US without a US passport. Fox
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013, 7:59 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
May you please confirm whether or not you have applied for Gabriel's passport yet? And, if not, may you please confirm whether you intend to? Thank you, Fox
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013, 8:36 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
Haven't had a chance to go to the courthouse yet but I'll let you know how much it costs so you can send me the money for it.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013, 8:55 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
The fees are $105 for a minor's passport. The expedited processing is an additional $60 plus overnight shipping charges. The information is available on the passport office's web site. But, I don't recall you asking me to pay for this...nor do I recall offering to pay for this. Can't you take it out of your marijuana or cigarette money? Nevertheless, if I do end up paying for it I will just authorize Gabriel to put it on the credit card. Fox
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013, 9:21 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
I quit both, so no - I can't. I do recall you stating that you would be handling all travel expenses. This qualifies.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013, 9:50 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
I stated that I would handle all travel expenses for him to visit me during his fall break. It was not an offer made in perpetuity. My obligations are to Gabriel - not you. Do you mean to tell me that after all those remarks about how I am unable to provide for Gabriel's needs, and about how it was Liz supporting, not me; all your comments about how you can provide him all the things I (and Liz) can't - that the tables have turned so much (in less than 6 months) that you're in such dire straights that you can't afford $165. Are you serious? You've been working at the same job, supposedly making the highest allowable raises each year (your words), which would put you somewhere around $68,000 a year by now, and you can't afford $160? As for you quitting smoking and marijuana: do you forget that my son is residing in your apartment? I speak with him almost every day. And, he knows what marijuana smells like. Anyway, there's still the pending matter before the court of the 12 months of child support back payments (which are around $7800) which we'll be address very soon. Fox
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013, 9:57 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
The marajuana is not by choice, it's by necessity. How the hell do you presume to know how much my raises are you pretentious ass? And do you mean to tell me that all your comments about how you needed $700 a month in child support to raise Gabriel because I "obviously" don't know how much it takes to raise a child, so much so that you took me to court 3 times to get it early are suddenly forgotten as "the tables have turned" and now you have a paycheck? Yes, I'm telling you that I don't have $165 to spend on a passport. And exactly how did you see that working? Do you expect a courthouse to allow a 13 year old to pay with a credit card? Or do you expect them to allow me to pay with a credit card not in my name?
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013, 10:40 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
The marijuana is absolutely a choice. There are other pain relief medications available which will not get you high. No one has a gun at your head forcing you to smoke marijuana. And, marijuana is a narcotic. You are using it on a daily basis. Therefore, you are using (and spending money, which you claim not to have) on drugs...to get high. You don't actually have fibromyalgia, nor do you have chronic and debilitating pain. If you do, and if you really "require" daily marijuana use to alleviate that pain then guess what? You are clearly not able to take care of two children. The police, the CPS worker and the investigator all say that you appeared to be active and functioning fine. I know how much your raises are because you told me in your prior emails when you were trying to make me feel small and inadequate. You also stated in a prior sworn declaration that you've been receiving the maximum allowable raises each year for the past 4 years. But in your latest declaration you've sworn, under oath, that you have not received ANY raises. Oops! I don't think the court will push the perjury issue...though they may. Who's the pretentious ass now, huh? (By the way, that's not what "pretentious" means - perhaps you meant "obnoxious"?) No, the child support is not forgotten. We will be going to court in a few months to address those back payments, and finalize the divorce. One difference between my idea of the cost of raising a child and yours, is that I also look at the long term and indirect costs (like university, unanticipated medical expenses (braces, surgery for his right eye - there have been very successful stem cell advancements that can recover his eye - but I don't think your insurance will cover it and it's around $30,000), a car when he turns 16, etc) you think the cost of raising a child is just the day-to-day expenses. What the hell are you going to do when that other kid of yours finishes high school (assuming he finishes high school) and wants to go to university? Who's going to pay for that? Clearly not you or Michael. The $700 a month is not for day-to-day expenses - it's all inclusive. A 13 year can most certainly use a credit card, just like any adult. There is no minimum age to use a credit card. And if the passport office doesn't take credit cards, then there is no reason he cannot go to an ATM and get cash. As for you using Gabriel's credit card - you are expressly prohibited from doing so and if you ever do I would, very much, look forward to having you charged with credit card fraud:). It would appear you've become irrelevant. Now, as far as you not having $165 - normally, I'm not the type to rub it in, but you've just put so much effort into trying to belittle me when I was in a rut, even though for me it was just a temporary setback (not a way of life). You just make it so hard for a person to not want to rub your face in it. But, nevertheless, I'm too mature and dignified to stoop to that level. Besides, you have enough problems coming up over the next few months. I shall just watch quitely, from afar things crumble around you and you find yourself incapable of doing anything to stop it...and no one left to help you. If you hadn't done all the terrible things you had over the last couple of years I might even feel bad for you. But I don't - because you've just been such an evil person:). Good night, Desiree. I shall see you tomorrow morning, at court. Cheers, Fox
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013, 11:42 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
I forgot to mention, previously, that you made an error in your declaration, regarding Gabriel being in Arizona for more than 6 months. Under the UCCJEA there is an exception to the 6 month residency rule for a state to become the child's home state and to gain jurisdiction. In cases where a parent gains custody of the child as a result of that parent's bad faith actions, and takes the child to another state, then the six month rule does not apply and the child's home state shall remain with the original state, who shall also retain jurisdiction. No matter how long Gabriel is with you in Arizona, as long as his presence there is the result you calling ICE for the explicit purpose of having me arrested, detain, and deported so that you would gain custody of Gabriel, then the six month clock will never begin. And, since you have already admitted that you were the one that called them and that you did so in order to gain custody of Gabriel, California will remain his home state and jurisdiction will remain there. Moreover, although I am currently physically in Vancouver, I have been maintaining a residence in Los Angeles - my mail goes there, I have a credit card linked to that address, I've been ordering things at that address, and I still use my California license, which has that address. A child custody proceeding may only be moved to another state if NIETHER parent maintains a connection to the current state of jurisdiction. As long as I maintain an address in California, jurisdiction CANNOT be moved to Arizona unless I consent - even if the bad faith exception did not apply (but, it does in this case). Fox
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013, 9:21 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
I quit both, so no - I can't. I do recall you stating that you would be handling all travel expenses.