Deportation and hearing of 03/14/13

Desiree:

I just checked the court's web site and there is no hearing listed for
3/14/13.  There is an entry for 3/12/13 but, as I said I was not provided
notice so if there was, in fact, a hearing and an order then it would not
be valid and would have to be vacated (just like the orders from the
Arizona court when it was determined that California had jurisdiction).  A
court may not enter an order without providing all parties an opportunity
to be present.  It's the law.

Now, about being deported on February 15: the ICE officers transported me
to LAX and escorted me to the gate.  Then they left.  Under the legal
definition of "in custody" the moment they left I was no longer "in
custody" and was legally, then, released from ICE custody.  LAX is located
in the City of Los Angeles, so my statement was literally true.  I boarded
the plane of my own free will (because the ICE officers were no longer
present) so I was not "deported" in the legal sense of the word.  Again, my
statements were literally true.  In order for me to be "deported" in the
legal sense I would have to be "in custody" until the point that I am
physically removed from the United States.  That was not the case on
February 15, nor was it the case yesterday.  I came to Vancouver on my own.

Now, as I stated on the telephone, if you agree to return Gabriel to my
custody upon the completion of the school year then I will not proceed with
seeking to cancel your visitation.  My legal address is still in California
(regardless of where I happen to be, physically, at this moment), so the
California court continues to have jurisdiction.

Please recall, in November, the court said that if the statements about you
and Kristopher, in my declaration, are true then you have some serious
issues to consider.

Also, be advised, I am in the process of having the removal order from 2009
vacated and once that's complete then ICE will have no legal basis to
arrest or detain me further.  The reason they keep arresting me and only
re-instating that removal order, and not charging me with illegal re-entry
is because their attorney knows that they cannot possibly convict me of
illegal re-entry because they have already verified my birth record with
Florida.  It's just that darned prior removal order that gives them the
legal authority to enforce it.

Good day.

Fox