Kristopher's shoplifting charge
From:
To:
Date:
Sun, Sep 09, 2012, 8:37 PM
Subject:
Kristopher's shoplifting charge
Desiree: I wonder if you wouldn't mind telling me just what it was that Kristopher got caught shoplifting, anyway. I'm just curious what a 37 year old man desires so badly that he feels the need to shoplift it (you have to admin, shoplifting is a pretty trashy type of crime to commit). Do you remember how you used to insist to me, the court, and the mediator that he was not that kind of person any more and he paid his debt to society? If you cannot handle your own communication then just don't. It's juvenile to have your boyfriend send emails on your behalf when you realize you've fucked up again. Why do you always rely on men to bail you out? Contrary to Kristopher's statements you really are still that fucked up little 19 year old, trying to get by on your fake sweetness and people's pity. Good evening.
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Sep 10, 2012, 4:00 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's shoplifting charge
Ha! You're funny.
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Sep 10, 2012, 4:59 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's shoplifting charge
I'm sorry. How is that funny?
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Sep 10, 2012, 5:30 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's shoplifting charge
How many times am I going to have to tell you to stop antagonizing Desiree? I wasn't shoplifting if you must know, I had left 2 items on the bottom of a cart and didn't see them after I had purchased the rest of the items. I don't give a fuck of you believe me or not, you're a coward ass bully and youre pushing it buddy. Keep running your mouth, one day it will catch up to you. Take that however you want. It's pretty sad that your own father hates you and has disowned you. After all my past problems my family stood by my side and remained supportive; I wonder what you did that was so dispicable your family wants nothing to do with you. Desiree has asked me to not respond to your childish attacks, but I'm afraid you have become too intrusive on my family to not step in. You are not to email Desiree again, please don't doubt how serious I am. Patrick Fox or whatever name you're going by this week, no name can change the person it represents. Great example youre setting for your son, even he knows how fake you are, him more than anyone
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Sep 10, 2012, 5:47 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's shoplifting charge
Then why would you plead guilty? Only a guilty person would plead guilty to a crime. Besides, it's all covered in the police report. As for the rest of your bland attempts to insult me you must know that there is nothing you can say that would phase me. Your statements about my family are ineffectual since I have no respect or concern for them. I can only speculate that the reason they dislike me is that they are unhappy with their own lives and it bothers them that I left them behind and accomplished something while they still live their pathetic, meager existences. But that's just my guess. As for you, if you think my attempts at communication with Desiree are so childish then why do you respond to them? I keep in touch with Desiree for two reasons only: because she insists on pretending that she is interested in being part of Gabriel's life; and because I wish for her to accept her financial responsibilities with respect to Gabriel. That insistence mandates my communication with her because I am the custodial parent. And I say "pretends" because, as you will see when you read the declaration I've filed with the court, her actions and behavior are completely contrary to her words. If she acted responsibly and in Gabriel's interests, and stopped wanting to bring him out there to be around drug users who are committing shoplifting and forgery then I would have nothing to talk to her about. And regarding your hopes that the forgery case has gone away - there will be no such luck, I spoke with the MCAO earlier today to check on the status of your case and, at this point, after reviewing the police reports they have requested yet further investigation. I also spoke with the Peoria court about your probation and it turns out it is only for one year (you got a break there, I guess) but at this point you're still on it. As long as there is a chance that Gabriel is going to be in your care I will be sure to stay on top of what you're doing and how your cases are going. Fox
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Sep 10, 2012, 5:58 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's shoplifting charge
I've asked you to stay out of my business, now you can respond to a harassment order I intend on filing. I will also contact the mcao and inform them of your motivation and subsequent order to cease your intrusion, violation of that will cause your arrest and dare I say, deportation? If that's the game you wish to play so be it
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Sep 10, 2012, 6:18 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's shoplifting charge
That's fine. You go right ahead and file your harassment claim. When they ask how I am harassing you you can say that I am trying to communicate with my wife/mother of my child/your girlfriend about family court matters and you initiated contact with me by sending me an offensive and abusive email...wait...that's not harassment (especially since you were the one that emailed ME with profanities and insults). I suppose you can also tell them that the family court judge here clearly told Desiree to keep her boyfriend out of these matters...wait...that doesn't really help you either. How, exactly, am I harassing you? If anything it seems YOU'RE the one harassing ME. But I would not bother with filing a harassment claim because I can just choose to ignore your emails. Regarding the MCAO, nothing that they've told me is not public record, available through their web site. My motivation is to ensure the safety and security of my child. There has been no intrusion. I've not committed any crime so there would be no basis for arrest. ICE has already resolved the deportation and unlawful detention issues to both their and my satisfaction. You're not very smart, are you? I do not wish to play any game. If you don't want people poking around in your affairs then don't shack up with a woman that has as much baggage and drama as Desiree has. And don't take my son with you when you go to WalMart to pass counterfeit bills. Good day to you.
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, Sep 11, 2012, 11:47 AM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's shoplifting charge
I am not your wife. I don't even know who you are. You are also not "communicating" with me. You are badgering, harassing, insulting, and threatening me.
Good try. Your days in this country are numbered buddy - so enjoy America while you can.
Good day.
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, Sep 11, 2012, 12:58 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's shoplifting charge, marriage validity
I'm terribly sorry to have to break this to you but: a) there is a marriage certificate with our names on it, dated 8/29/2000; b) no court has entered an order terminating that marriage; therefore, you and I are married. The fact that you filed for divorce in Arizona in 2011 confirms your acknowledgment of the validity of the marriage. The fact that you responded to my petition to dissolve the marriage in 2001 further confirms that acknowledgment. The fact that you terminated the divorce proceedings that you commenced in Arizona confirms that you, perhaps subconsciously, are not as interested in being divorced from me as you say. The fact that you have not recommenced divorce proceedings further confirms that. If, as you insist, I was already married at the time you and I got married then that would not automatically void our marriage. Until a court of competent jurisdiction enters an order annulling a marriage, that marriage remains legal and valid. To the best of my knowledge there is no such order. You and Kristopher do not have the authority to declare a marriage void just because you want to believe I was already or still married to someone else at the time. You must also consider, when a marriage is annulled (by a court, not by the parties) its as though it never existed in the first place. So, if I was already married to someone, as you say, and I had THAT marriage annulled (either before or after our marriage) then, legally, that first marriage never occurred. Which means that our marriage is valid. Let's assume arguendo for a moment: do you know that I did not annul that marriage? If that annulment was completed, let's say, last month, then that would mean that our marriage is as valid as it could possibly be because the first marriage is considered to have never existed. So, please, on what basis are you saying that you are not my wife? In the legal sense you are unquestionably my wife and I am unquestionably your husband. In a practical sense, I would not marry someone who is a) not Jewish, and b) below my social strata, anyway. Please let me know if I am ill informed on any of this. Thank you, Fox P.S. The judge also acknowledges that we ARE still married. I believe that is part of the reason he doesn't seem to be taking our case very seriously. He thinks we're playing games. Otherwise, we would also get a divorce. Speaking of which, I just got back from the court, from filing the new child support OSC and the dissolution of marriage petition, anyway. See, it'll all be over soon and you can move on to your third marriage (damn, 3 marriages by the age of 31 - just like your mother, I suppose).
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, Sep 11, 2012, 1:26 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's shoplifting charge
Has it ever occurred to you that if you consider this communication to be "badgering, harassing, and insulting" that you could simply ignore it? And by responding, aren't you conceding to it's legitimacy? With respect to your statement: "Your days in this country are numbered buddy - so enjoy America while you can." As I have stated in the immigration court, repeatedly, I am not opposed to being deported. I did not fight my deportation proceedings. I told them if they can find a country that would accept me then I will gladly go. It's all in the transcripts which you can obtain through the immigration court. All I said was that I was a US citizen. They're the ones that dragged it on for four years because they couldn't establish that I was the person they claimed I was. So, go ahead and make such statements. If Canada will accept me then I have no problem settling in Vancouver. Of course, I would petition the court to take Gabriel with me and unless you can provide a very compelling reason why the court shouldn't then the court will maintain the status quo (that's how the process works). Which means you will still have your visitation periods but you'd have to fly him from Vancouver (or Tel Aviv or where ever). Assuming the court doesn't finally see through your facade. The exhibits I've attached to my declaration should show the court, clearly, how you say and agree to anything just to get what you want then disregard that once you have it. Good day to you. Fox
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Sep 10, 2012, 5:33 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's shoplifting charge
Curious, how would shoplifting be any different than writing bad checks. That's even more white trash, way to live up to the stereotype.
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Sep 10, 2012, 5:53 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's shoplifting charge
Here's the differences: 1) I was not found guilty, you were. 2) My charges are from 5 years ago, yours are from 9 months ago. We are interested in what's happening now, not what happened 5 years ago. 3) You have similar convictions from 7 - 10 years ago, then within two years of getting out of prison you're back at it. That shows that you're incorrigible and that 7 years in prison did not reform you. I, on the other hand, have not been to prison and have not been repeatedly found guilty of the same offenses. Can you see the differences?