Gabriel's birthday present

Are you on crack?  You said in your own email that you would not have
the means to contribute less than $100 to Gabriel's necessary expenses
AND get him a birthday present.  You said it yourself that you only get
two paychecks this month.  That can only mean that you are living
paycheck to paycheck.  And children learn much by observing the example
set by their parents.  Therefore, Sage sees the way you and Michael live
and accepts it as the norm.  Gabriel sees how you and I live and decides
which he will consider the better way.

You are, again, making vague, unsupported assertions which cannot be
properly addressed because you provide no foundation.  For example, you
say "you hear things second hand and make up the circumstances" - what
are you referring to?  What circumstances have I made up.  Didn't I
provide specific references to support my claims?  You say "So far, you
have been wrong about every situation you said would happen to me..." -
again, unless you provide specific examples then how can the issue be
reasonably considered.  Either provide examples or shut up.  You're
wasting everyone's time.

Now let's consider some of my predictions that I was not wrong about:
1. I said you would be required to return Gabriel.  Correct.
2. I said your attorney Goldfarb was a hack who was feeding you crap.
Correct.
3. I said the MCAO would prosecute Kristopher for the forgery charges.
Correct.
4. I said Gabriel would grow to despise you for the way you act.
Correct.
5. I said you live paycheck to paycheck.  Correct.
6. I said you're a pothead.  Correct.
7. I said that you would choose Kristopher over your children.  Correct.

Please provide some examples of things I was wrong about.

You cannot say my "evidence" is circumstantial.  My evidence consists of
your own emails, police reports, court records.  How is that
circumstantial.  My single biggest evidence is usually your own
admissions because you are too arrogant and insecure to keep your mouth
closed when you should.  At the same time, you refuse to cooperate in
discovery or to respond to questions that I have a legal right to know
about (like whose living in your house when Gabriel is there).

You see, your response is typical of uneducated, uncultured people that
have no legitimate defense or response (I'm trying to avoid using the
term white trash because it seems to hit you a little too close to
home).  If any of what you said was true then you would not have any
problems providing references to specific events.

With respect to Sage - I've heard enough about him, and as they say the
apple doesn't fall very far from the tree.  I child is the product of
his environment, so I know everything there is to know about him.  He's
an intellectually mediocre, overly emotional, emotionally and
psychologically unstable child with anger control and violence issues,
who whines to get what he wants and doesn't respect other people's
privacy or property.  Golly gee, sounds just like his parents.  Imagine
that.

Again, I ask that you try to be more specific, and provide references in
you arguments.  Otherwise, your arguments are empty and meaningless.


Fox
		

If you say so.  But nevertheless, based on your history of spewing
bullshit (need references?) unless you provide evidence, like a credit
card statement or a receipt it's just more of your blah-blah-blah.

You know what kind of people build their argument based on what the
other party just said?  White trash and ignorant people.  If I had said
that I pre-ordered the game in June you would have said that you ordered
it in May.  You remember the school supplies?  You found out I purchased
the last items on July 6 so you claimed you bought him the supplies on
July 4.  However, when you finally produced a receipt it said July 6 - 3
hours after I told Gabriel on the telephone that I had ordered him the
backpack and binder he said he wanted.  What an incredible coincidence.
Anyway, the backpack, binders, and supplies you got him are sitting in
the closet being very useful.  It's so much better that you got him
duplicate supplies rather than, say, uniforms or a tablet.  Those
certainly wouldn't have been useful to him (sarcasm).  Nice going,
again, "mom".


Fox