Kristopher's text messages last night
On Mon, May 14, 2012, 7:44 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Mon, May 14, 2012, 7:44 PM
Subject:
Kristopher's text messages last night
Desiree: Last night Kristopher sent the following two messages to Liz's mobile phone. I respectfully request you instruct Kristopher to refrain from sending ANY messages to Liz's phone. Moreover, would you kindly direct him to also refrain from initiating any unnecessary communication with me, as I have no interest in corresponding with him and any issues that may exist between you and I are between you and I. I wonder if you might clarify what he is talking about in the following two messages? Unfortunately, I truly have no idea and I do not get his reference to Jezebel (I'm assuming he's referring to Jezebel from the Book of Kings, in the Tanakh). And, in the second message: what sins is he referring to that he believes Gabriel has committed? Or should I just assume he's being insecure and ignore the messages? Finally, nothing written herein is intended to be sarcastic or offensive. If you take it as such then I'm sorry but that would be your inference, not my implication. Do not read more into it than what's written. Thank you, Fox Messages sent from Kristopher to Liz's phone:Received: Sun, May 10:07pm"May the same heartache and disappointment befall you 10 fold [sic]for your lack of courtesy and gratitude for the woman who bore the child you love. I curse you both jezebel [sic] and Jew"Received: Sun, May 13, 10:16pm"About your son, who's [sic] sins befall the father... Not making any attempt to show kindness to the woman who gave him life."
On Mon, May 14, 2012, 10:11 PM, Kristopher Lauchner wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, May 14, 2012, 10:11 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's text messages last night
Grow a pair Dick, I don't care if you want communication with me or not, the fact is you have no say as to when I decide communication is appropriate and with whom it will be directed, neither does Desiree. You might let Liz dictate instructions to you and Shepard you around like some mentally challenged person, but my involvement is at my discretion. You want to request something from me be a man for once and do it yourself. You sure as hell aren't putting that task to my woman, who has more than enough to deal with because of you and your games. Dick.. Very suiting name
On Mon, May 14, 2012, 11:51 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Mon, May 14, 2012, 11:51 PM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's text messages last night
Kristopher: I am sorry that you have to be so misguided and infantile in your efforts. To begin with, I HAVE requested of you, directly, that you desist your repeated attempts engage me in communication. I would think that the restraining order would be a pretty clear and unequivocal expression of my desire for you to leave me alone. Surely you are not so slow of mind that you did not get that. If you're going to speak please, at least, try to say things that are negligibly intelligent. Second, I do not know what you are referring to with your statement about letting Liz dictate instructions to me. That's quite an ill informed declaration on your part. But, since your opinion means less to me than the lint in my pocket you just go ahead and believe what you would like. I shall try not to lose any sleep over it. Third, calling me Dick, well, that's just trite, lacks creativity and originality and is really quite silly. Any eight year old knows that Dick is a variant of Richard, and that "dick" is also a colloquialism for penis. It's called a double entendre, and if used in an original or ironic context then it could actually be amusing - but in this case it's just quite imbecilic and tired. I really hope you are not so thick that you think that would annoy me. Perhaps I expect too much from you... Fourth, with respect to your belief that you have the right to continue your correspondence with me as you have been, and that I have no say in the matter - you are, again, misinformed. In California one can seek a restraining order against a party who is being harassing. And you, sir, are being harassing! The prior restraining order was based on my belief in there being a credible threat to my and/or Gabriel's safety. If you do not immediately desist I will seek such an order from the court, based on your ongoing harassment. This serves as my official notice of intent. You again allude to me taking some action that is causing Desiree hardship. I fail to see exactly what I have done that is causing her stress. I would ask you to expound on that topic and to provide details, however, my desire is for you to leave me alone and mind your own business. As the judge at the restraining order hearing clearly enunciated to you: you have nothing to do with the relations between Desiree and I; you have no business interfering or getting involved. If Desiree wishes to have a relationship with Gabriel then her and I must tolerate each other. There is one thing that intrigues me though. Intelligent people usually prefer to be around other intelligent people and have little patience for ignorance or idiocy. Although I am disappointed in Desiree's behavior I have steadfastly asserted that she IS a very intelligent person with significant potential. So how the hell does she tolerate you? It is clear to me (as it would be to ANY person with an IQ over 90) that you have nothing relevant to say and nothing to contribute to the world. Doesn't it make you feel small or insignificant being with a woman that you know is so much smarter and more capable than you? Maybe that's why you're so insecure about me (if you weren't you wouldn't write these driveling emails to me, you would ignore me just like I ignore you). Are you worried that one day Desiree is going to realize that you provide her no intellectual stimulation and that she's bored? Do you think that maybe, when she gets passed whatever unfounded loathing she currently has for me that there is a chance her and I may get back together and you'll lose your meal ticket? Henceforth, I shall have any messages from you automatically routed to the trash folder where they shall expire, unread. And, based on your grammar and writing style I think I am able to discern between the messages from you and those from Desiree (she has a broader vocabulary, better grammar and is able to articulate using words with more than two syllables). It must really suck to be you. I thank you for your time. Sincerely, Fox P.S. You will better understand the meaning of the statements in this message if you read it with a dictionary on hand and take the time to look up all those big confusing words I've used. I know that stupid people often try to get by by simply ignoring the words they don't know or by trying to determine their meaning from the context they're used in but I really don't advise that. Note to Desiree: I mean no disrespect to you by anything I have stated herein. You may notice I am responding to Kristopher's comments. I did not initiate this communication with him. And I did not initiate the insults (not that his attempts are all that insulting to me - it's kind of like a paraplegic making fun of the way I run). Do you really believe that Kristopher is the best you could do (I'm speaking intellectually)?
On Tue, May 15, 2012, 12:30 AM, Kristopher Lauchner wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, May 15, 2012, 12:30 AM
Subject:
Re: Kristopher's text messages last night
Oh I guess that puts me in my place, I better go back to the trailer park and sort with the inferiors where I belong. You bested me, and seein how the dictionary is used to keep the tv up high I suppose there ain't much else I can do. I feel sorry for you... You actually don't know why Desi would be upset do you? You couldn't have relations with a prostitute let alone a real woman. How did you ever find clients during your days as a prostitute anyways? You're not nearly smart enough to make me feel inferior with your words, nice effort though. If you want to try and seek protection from the courts every time someone does something you don't like go ahead, you only make yourself look more and more pathetic. Im sorry Desi is the closest thing you have to a relationship with a woman, but she is with me and like it or not will remain with me because I know how to love her. My only concern is her, and as long as you do not cause her pain I stay out of your business. I will defend her and protect her with my life however until the day I die.