Update
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012, 11:33 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Desiree: http://www.mcso.org/Mugshot/MugDetail.aspx?id=P909347 http://www.jailbase.com/en/arrested/az-mcso/2012-10-02/kristopher-michael- lauchner-p909347 Real nice, Desiree. You sure did pick a winner there, didn't ya? So, are you still insisting that Kristopher is a very sweet guy, and great with the kids, and that he's paid his debt to society and is not the person he was 7 years ago? Or are you finally going to stop with that silliness? He sure doesn't look very happy in those pictures. Suppose he was having a bad day? Did he get bail? Are you going to have to get further in debt to bail him out? Do you get to pay for his attorney or will he go with the public defender? Will you use this as another excuse not to support your children? If he's in custody do you think the MCAO is going to proceed with all the other cases against him now (they often do that when a person is in custody). By the way, I lied when I said previously that the MCAO decided not to proceed with the forgery case - they actually requested the Scottsdale PD conduct further investigation. Boy, your life is really going to shit isn't it? And the day after your birthday, to boot. Man it must really suck to be you. So, does this mean you won't be exercising your visitation this weekend? It's probably for the best because I don't think Gabriel would want to be around you right now. Come on, shoplifting again? And prohibited possessor? That's like, what, 7 years? And possession of a dangerous drug? Meth, right? And discharging a firearm in city limits? Where do you find these types of people - and more importantly what can you possibly see in them? Dang, dangerous drugs and prohibited possession - I'm sorry, but I think your boy might be going away for a long, long time. And don't forget the forgery cases. Yep, a damn long time. Will you wait for him? Will you stay faithful? But you guys love each other so much. Isn't he, like, the greatest guy you ever met, or some such nonsense? Gee, I sure hope he gets bail because I can't imagine what you'd do without "your man" to support you. Well, I look forward to seeing how this latest development plays out. I sure can't wait to get the police report on this one. All the best, Fox P.S. Wow, you must really be freaking out right now. P.P.S. Ah, that's rich. Well, I feel pretty darn good.
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012, 8:27 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
Before you start in on me know that he will not be bonded or released. I have not, nor will I ever speak to him again and he is no longer a part of my life. Thank you so much for all your kind words. I trusted you and look where that got me. I trusted Michael - look where that got me. I trusted him and that was my 3rd and final mistake. You can now discount any documentation you had against him in the custody case as it is no longer relevant.
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012, 9:35 AM, Patrick Fox wrote:
What!?!?!? You say "I trusted you and look where that got me." That seems to be a recurring claim of yours but what exactly did I do to you that was so bad? When did I ever abuse your trust or take advantage you? How was I in any way responsible for ANY of the difficulties you've had? The only perceived shortcoming on my end was that I was not very sensitive - but I'm not a sensitive person and I was fed up with your lies and manipulation. You lied to me about your father forcing you to have an abortion; you lied to me about having a miscarriage; you lied to me about using drugs; you lied to me about looking for work; you wrecked the car three weeks after we bought it; your manipulated me into moving to Phoenix in September 2000 so you could be close to your mother when Gabriel was born; you manipulated me into letting your drug using friend stay with us. The list goes on and on. Tell me ONE bad thing that I did to you!!! Just one thing!!! Tell me one way that I took advantage of you when you!!! As for Kristopher being irrelevant to the custody case, I disagree. The fact that you stuck up for him for so long, knowing what he was doing; vouched for him; ignored his criminal activity; left the children in his care on a regular basis; had him living in the house with you and the children; (presumably) had meth in the house and allowed it; (presumably) had firearms in the house knowing it was illegal for either you or him to possess a firearm (you because of your documented drug use, him because of his drug use and felonies); brought him to the family court proceedings (there's security video of you and him in the court room), shows an incredible lack of good judgment and a willingness and history of repeatedly putting your children in danger for your own selfish desires. So, yes, he is still relevant to the custody proceedings (inasmuch as it show your selfishness and lack of judgment). If you had left him before this happening it might have shown good faith or sincerity on your part, but the fact that you're claiming he is out of your life now that he's probably going to be in prison for the next 15 years shows that you only did it because you, literally, had no choice. Had he been released he'd be with you right now talking about how much of a prick I am. One last point I HAVE to make: you're saying that me, Michael, AND Kristopher have been the source of much of your problems. Let's assume that's true. Do you not see a pattern there? YOU keep picking these people to be in serious long term relationships with, to live with, and to have children with. At some point you have to realize the problem may be with YOU choosing the wrong people. (Of course, this is based on the false premise that the men in your life really are the cause of your problems. In my case I fail to see anything wrong or bad that I did and you've failed to state anything bad that I did; in Michael's case, you stayed with him for 8 years so if he was so bad why didn't you leave sooner? And until now you've still insisted that he was a good person and that you and him are on good terms. In Kristopher's case you knew exactly what he was doing but instead of ending the relationship you tried to justify his behavior, got mad at me at told me to mind my own business.) Oh, but look on the bright side: if you're really done with him then he will no longer be a financial drain on you; and if you really are staying off drugs then there won't be that temptation/influence around. Good day to you, Miss Capuano
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012, 10:18 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
Stop pretending to be a good guy. You either have memory loss or have lied to yourself for so long you believe your own lies. I'm too busy cleaning shitup to read your bullshit.
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012, 10:44 AM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Alright, so tell me one thing...just one thing that I did that was so bad. No, you know what, it doesn't even need to be "so" bad. Even one thing that was just a little, tiny bit bad. Or one way that I took advantage of you or your ignorance or naivete. You're so great at painting this very vague picture of how everybody and the world have been so hard on you but you can't point to a single specific thing that I have done to you. Why do you think that is? Because none of it is true! How is it that I can easily point out very specific things that you have done? Because they ARE true! When you get right down to it YOU were the one taking advantage of MY kindness and generosity. Not the other way around. If I'm wrong then correct me by providing specific references to things I've done. You can't say that you don't have time right now, because I've presented this request to you numerous times and you've NEVER provided such references. Do you really want to do a side by side comparison to see who the good person is? You keep trying to portray yourself as being a kind, caring, good hearted person but you can't state a single specific thing that you have done to support that portrayal. On the other hand a have a list of things you've done over the last 18 months to prove that you are not that kind of person. Your admitted and documented actions show you to be selfish, manipulative, angry, spiteful, inconsiderate, and at times downright mean and vindictive person. So far I have kept things out of court which would show how you really are but I intend to make sure the evaluator and the judge have everything they need to not be swayed by your poor, beaten down, abused little girl routine anymore. So far you've been able to use your manipulative tactics on the court but when the judges realizes that it was all just an act and that he bought into it, I'm sure he will be that much more upset with you. Anyway, get back to cleaning up feces - it seems to be what you've had the most practice at. Fox
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012, 11:32 AM, Patrick Fox wrote:
I shall address your inquiry: "I trusted you and look where that got me." After some consideration here is what I have concluded: 1. It got you interested in, and started with Oracle. Had I not pushed you to study Oracle then you would likely not have selected it as a course of study at the college. That then led to the career and job you now have. 2. It got you out of Penn Mar, where you were confined indefinitely, under a court order. Had you not trusted me you would have sat there for at least 3 months. 3. It got you the opportunity to live in an economically comfortable environment where you didn't have to scrape by or stress over petty financial concerns or be dependent on the generosity of others. 4. It got you excellent medical coverage which, if not for, then Gabriel would have had serious complications considering he was 3 months premature. By the way, I did hear back from Blue Cross on the issue of whether they billed you for anything, including the helicopter. No, they did not. Nothing related to Gabriel's birth was billed to you or went on your credit. 5. It got you the ability to stay at home with Gabriel without having to worry about working. 6. It got you the opportunity to relocate to Phoenix to be close to your mother during the pregnancy and after Gabriel's birth. 7. It got you off of drugs (albeit, temporarily). I do wonder how much of your decision to separate was influenced by your return to drug use (recall, when you went to your mother's in August 2001 you started smoking marijuana again...three weeks later you said you wanted to go back to Phoenix). 8. It gave you the opportunity to see that a person doesn't have to carry on the lifestyle of their childhood or families, and that a person is only limited by their ambition and willingness to work hard for something. 9. It showed you (although you seem to have ignored this lesson) the importance of financial security and responsibility. Especially when children are involved. I'm sure there's more and if they come to me I'll let you know. So, what are the bad things you keep talking about? Just one thing, that's all I'm asking for. One bad thing. Fox
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012, 2:57 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
You are so full of yourself. Yeah - and I gave you a son!
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012, 3:15 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
How am I so full of myself? Are my statements not true? And you did not "give" me a son. That's a fairly ridiculous statement, don't you think? Gabriel is not an object to be bartered, or a payment for services rendered. And by your logic I equally gave you a son. Moreover, if you "gave" me a son then why are you giving us so much grief and trying to take him back? Wouldn't that make you an Indian giver? I might also remind you that when I was 26 and you were 19 I was mature enough to know that we were too young and self absorbed to have children. But you entered your false claims of being forced to have an abortion and your false claim of having had at least one miscarriage, in order to gain my pity so I would go along with your decision to keep the child. So, how is it that you gave me a son? You manipulated me into agreeing to support YOUR desire to have a child. If anything, you gave yourself a son. Is that not how you remember it? I would also like to point out that the purpose of my email was to demonstrate that there does not seem to be a basis for your ongoing claim that you trusted me and I somehow screwed you over or took advantage of your trust. By saying "Yeah - and I gave you a son!" does not address the point that you keep trying to make it seem like I was so bad to you. Please try to stay on point so our discussions can be more productive. Unless you can provide a rebuttal to the list of points I sent you then I shall accept that you concede ways being with me has benefited you. Thank you, Fox